· Private foundation
Gte Federal Credit Union Charitable Trust
Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of GTE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k8 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $103k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA | $13,750 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA | $12,500 |
| EAST AREA ADULT SCHOOL | $11,450 |
| THOMAS PROMISE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA | $10,000 |
| ENTERPRISING LATINAS INC | $10,000 |
| FUND FOR CHARITABLE DEVELOPMENT | $10,000 |
| FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| HOPE VILLAGES OF AMERICA | $7,500 |
| SPELMAN COLLEGE | $2,500 |
| GEORGIA INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY | $2,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI | $2,500 |
| MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $2,500 |
| STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC4× · 2018–2021 · $46k · revenue +143%
- TPTHOMAS PROMISE FOUNDATION INC5× · 2018–2022 · $43k · revenue +14%
- W4Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc4× · 2018–2021 · $28k · revenue +411%
Funded once
- TTTighten The Drag Foundation Incone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -40% · 38% of their budget
- PKPASCO KIDS FIRST INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +21%
- BGBoys & Girls Clubone grant, 2019 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education and Research
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.
Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…
Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Tampa Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Tighten the Drag Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS PROMISE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds A Brighter Community Inc ↗
- Who funds Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds Tighten The Drag Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds INSPIRED ACRES INC ↗
- Who funds PASCO KIDS FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds THE VOLUNTEER WAY INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds Enterprising Latinas Inc ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA DREAM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds University of South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds Hope Villages of America Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · The Florida Medical Clinic Foundation of Caring Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Jacarlene Foundation · United Way Suncoast Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Allegany Franciscan Ministries Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gte Federal Credit Union Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Pasco Kids First Inc — 13% of income from government
- Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc — 12% of income from government
- Tampa Family Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc — 6% of income from government
- Bethune-Cookman University — 6% of income from government
- Florida Institute of Technology Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Tampa Metropolitan Area Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
- Hope Villages of America Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- Florida Dream Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gte Federal Credit Union Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Gte Federal Credit Union Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.