Skip to content

· Community foundation

Grounds for Grace Inc

To provide funding to charities in fulfillment of the exempt purposes of national christian charitable foundation, inc.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$5.0MEducation$2.2MHuman Services$1.4MInternational$811kCrime & Legal$401kPhilanthropy$363kArts & Culture$51kHealth$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $925k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$73,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATERS INC$250,000
JESUS FILM PROJECT$235,000
ASBURY SEMINARY$200,000
WORLD RELIEF$125,000
A DOOR OF HOPE$100,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF INDIAN ROCKS$100,000
EVANGELISM EXPLOSION INTERNATIONAL$92,000
SHEPHERD'S VILLAGE INC$73,000
WOVEN ANEW$45,000
NEW LIFE SOLUTIONS$35,000
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$30,236
YOUNG CHRISTIAN LEADERS$25,000
MISSIONARY VENTURES THREADS OF HOPE INC$22,500
CRUCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$15,000
THE NAVIGATORS$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISSIONARY VENTURES THREADS OF HOPE INC: $23k → 12%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $86k → 13%MISSIONARY VENTURES THREADS OF HOPE INC: $20k → 12%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $60k → 13%THREADS OF HOPE INC: $20k → 12%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $57k → 13%MISSIONARY VENTURES THREADS OF HOPE INC: $20k → 12%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 13%MISSIONARY VENTURES THREADS OF HOPE INC: $20k → 12%TOP BUTTONS ST PETE INC: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.7M · 18 repeat orgs$285k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$9.7M
$230k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
0%

Still filing today

61%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +53%
  • TC
    TRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $763k · revenue +7%
  • WR
    WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $651k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • RM
    REYNOLDS MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $130k · revenue +90%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue 0%
  • TB
    TOP BUTTONS ST PETE
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Northwind Theological Seminary

Northwind Theological Seminary is an ecumenical online seminary serving many denominations, providing online theological education that is biblically based, with theological roots in Wesleyan tradition. The seminary has a strong emphasis…

Religion
3
Sole Ministries

None

Religion
4
Lakelight Institute

Lakelight Institute equips Christians with timeless wisdom for modern life.

Religion
5
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
6
New Hope International Ministries

To promote and foster christianity throughout the pacific rim, hawaii, and elsewhere.

Religion
7
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
8
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
9
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
10
Entrust

Entrust's mission is to multiply church leaders through accessible, locally owned, reproducible training systems. this is accomplished through facilitated learning, assisting christians in gaining solid understanding of scripture, and…

—
11
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
12
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Life Solutions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mustard Seed Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF INDIAN ROCKS CAMPUS INC: $1,616,027 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF INDIAN ROCKS CAMPUS INCWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $1,188,780 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $910,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCEVANGELISM EXPLOSION III INTERNATIONAL INC: $564,000 · OtherEVANGELISM EXPLOSION III INTERNATIONAL INCONE MORE CHILD INC: $509,793 · OtherONE MORE CHILD INCBROOKSTONE CHURCH: $460,000 · OtherBROOKSTONE CHURCHNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $247,600 · Other+8 more: $214,254 · OtherASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $1,200,000 · EducationASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMI…TRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC: $762,755 · EducationTRINITY COLLEGE OF FLOR…REYNOLDS MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $130,000 · EducationREYNOLDS MOUNTAIN CHRIS…+1 more: $60,000 · EducationA DOOR OF HOPE INC: $400,500 · ReligionDesigned For Joy: $250,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $36,000 · ReligionWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $650,500 · InternationalSHEPHERD'S VILLAGE INC: $443,123 · Housing & ShelterNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $362,527 · PhilanthropyHope International Ministries Inc: $217,500 · Human ServicesTHREADS OF HOPE INC: $102,500 · Human ServicesTOP BUTTONS ST PETE: $25,000 · Human Services
Other$5,710,454Education$2,152,755Religion$686,500International$650,500Housing & Shelter$443,123Philanthropy$362,527Human Services$345,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $1,200,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC: $762,755 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $650,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHEPHERD'S VILLAGE INC: $443,123 over 6y, 13% of budgetA DOOR OF HOPE INC: $400,500 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $362,527 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDesigned For Joy: $250,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetNEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC: $247,600 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetHope International Ministries Inc: $217,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetREYNOLDS MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $130,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTHREADS OF HOPE INC: $102,500 over 5y, 17% of budgetINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST PRIORITY OF TAMPA BAY INC: $51,021 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOP BUTTONS ST PETE: $25,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetMUSTARD SEED PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds A DOOR OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
  • Who funds Designed For Joy ↗
  • Who funds NEW LIFE SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope International Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds REYNOLDS MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THREADS OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PRIORITY OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds TOP BUTTONS ST PETE ↗
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grounds for Grace Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grounds for Grace Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grounds for Grace Inc?

Find your warmest path to Grounds for Grace Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grounds for Grace’s filings →

More from the funding graph