Skip to content
Gregory D and Kimberlee K White Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gregory D and Kimberlee K White Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$145kHuman Services$72kHealth$58kRecreation & Sports$55kReligion$26kAnimals$8kEnvironment$6kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$854k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$15,000
GABBYS LADDER$10,300
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$5,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINICS$5,000
TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES$5,000
THE SHELTER$1,500
VALERIES HOUSE$1,500
CONSERVANCY OF SW FLORIDA$1,000
SHEDD AQUARIUM$650
GILDA'S CLUB GRAND RAPIDS$20
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $205 → 14%VALERIES HOUSE: $2k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1k → 10%GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $650 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$291k · 18 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
33

Total granted

$291k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GABBY'S LADDER INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $69k · revenue +193%
  • HP
    HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +89%
  • TC
    TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • JC
    JESUS CHRIST CHURCH OF LDS
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • MC
    MONROE CO COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
3
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
9
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
10
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gilda's Club Grand Rapids; the most unlike its peers is The Malala Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TOLEDOJESUS CHRIST CHURCH OF LDS: $10,000 · OtherJESUS CHRIST CHURCH OF LDSMONROE CO COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10,000 · OtherMONROE CO COMMUNITY COLLEGEST MARY'S CHURCH - MRS CLAUS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherST MARY'S CHURCH - MRS CLAUS CLUBDUNDEE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $9,000 · OtherDUNDEE COMMUNITY SCHOOLSMONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7,861 · OtherMONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGETHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $6,305 · OtherST MARYS CHURCH: $5,300 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR MENTAL ILLINESS: $5,000 · OtherCHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS: $5,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherFIRST TEE: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+21 more: $11,620 · Other+21 moreGABBY'S LADDER INC: $68,500 · HealthGABBY'S LADDER INCNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $24,100 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INCCANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC: $18,000 · HealthCANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INCAMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · HealthHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $52,000 · EducationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITYSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $17,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO…THE MALALA FUND: $10,000 · EducationTHE MALALA FUND+2 more: $1,736 · EducationTERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsPROJECT SECOND CHANCE INC: $4,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,500 · AnimalsSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $1,150 · AnimalsGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1,650 · Human ServicesVALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesELARA CARING HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $205 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$140,086Health$115,600Education$81,236Recreation & Sports$30,000Animals$7,650Human Services$4,355Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGABBY'S LADDER INC: $68,500 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $52,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $30,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $24,100 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE NETWORK INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $6,305 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT SECOND CHANCE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $1,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $1,636 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB GRAND RAPIDS: $1,020 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE & INDUSTRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELARA CARING HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCIVIL AIR PATROL INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAMMA PHI BETA FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKula for Karma New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arthur J Gallagher Fo…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Raymond James Charita…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …
Arthur J Gallagher FoundationIL11.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gregory D and Kimberlee K White Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gregory D and Kimberlee K White Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Valerie's House Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gregory D and Kimberlee K White Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Gregory D and Kimberlee K White Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gregory D and Kimberlee K White’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home