Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Greenwich International Film Festival Inc

The mission of greenwich international film festival is to bridge the worlds of film and philanthropy with year-round programming and special events.

$303k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$201k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$336kHuman Services$160kHealth$150kCommunity Improvement$105kArts & Culture$100kPhilanthropy$40kYouth Development$26kInternational$10kOther$34k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$201,358
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$201,358
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN FAMILY CONNECTIONS$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HUMAN NEEDS PROJECT: $10k → 8%EVA LONGORIA FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation

The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…

Health
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
8
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Equitable Facilities Fund Inc

Eff is a nonprofit social impact fund that believes all children deserve a quality education. we empower high-performing public charter schools with equitable access to low-cost, long-term financing by innovatively combining…

Education
11
Healthwise Incorporated

The healthwise mission is to help people make better health decisions.

Health
12
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan and the most unlike its peers is The Leandro P Rizzuto Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $201,358 · EducationGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INCElevate 215 — $100,000 · EducationElevate 215WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC — $35,000 · EducationWATERSIDE SCHOOL INCTHE EVA LONGORIA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE EVA LONGORIA F…USA FOR UNFPA INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesUSA FOR UNFPA INCHuman Needs Project Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesHuman Needs Projec…THE SIMS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · HealthTHE SIMS FOUNDATI…ABILIS INC — $50,000 · HealthABILIS INCEVERY MOTHER COUNTS — $25,000 · HealthEVERY MOTHER COUN…Westchester Medical Center Foundation — $15,000 · HealthWestchester Medic…ALS Network — $10,000 · HealthALS NetworkHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FED…FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $5,000 · Community ImprovementCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN — $100,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S …THE LEANDRO P RIZZUTO FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HARTFORD DISPENSARY — $13,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND AUTO & TRANSPORTATION MUSEUM INC — $10,650 · Otherniblock 2017 family trust — $10,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH — $26,000 · OtherAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Other
Education$336,358Human Services$160,000Health$150,000Community Improvement$105,000Arts & Culture$100,000Philanthropy$40,000Other$69,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC — $201,358 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EVA LONGORIA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetElevate 215 — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE SIMS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetUSA FOR UNFPA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetABILIS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEANDRO P RIZZUTO FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH — $26,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWestchester Medical Center Foundation — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HARTFORD DISPENSARY — $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHuman Needs Project Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetALS Network — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Greenwich International Film Festival Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Abilis Inc — 74% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
  • The Hartford Dispensary — 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines