Skip to content
Green Umbrella Corporation at a glance

· Private foundation

Green Umbrella Corporation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$398k
Granted FY2020
39
Grants FY2020
6
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Human Services$151kEducation$121kHealth$89kYouth Development$50kEmployment$35kRecreation & Sports$15kCrime & Legal$15kInternational$12kOther$0
02FY2020 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k26 grants · $156k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $242k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KERRVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$46,881
PREGNANCY RESOUCRE CENTER$30,000
HILL COUNTRY VETERANS CENTER$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$30,000
CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPS$15,000
ARMS OF HOPE$15,000
CHRISTIAN MENS JOB CORPS$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH$10,000
HILL COUNTRY CRISIS COUNCIL$10,000
HILL COUNTRY CASA$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$6,000
SPECIAL OPPORTUNITY CENTER$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ARMS OF HOPE: $15k → 12%HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 13%ARMS OF HOPE: $5k → 12%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $10k → 13%PATHWAYS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 13%FAMILIES & LITERACY INC: $6k → 13%HILL COUNTRY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE: $6k → 13%ART2HEART: $6k → 13%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $5k → 13%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $4k → 13%HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $4k → 13%K'STAR INC: $6k → 13%KERR CONNECT: $6k → 13%KERR CONNECT: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314k · 15 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$314k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+226%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesHealthPublic BenefitCivil RightsEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Christian Assistance Ministry
    3× · 2017–2020 · $19k · revenue +170%
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (
    3× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +14%
  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY CASA INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • KC
    KERR COUNTY CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +226%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • SP
    ST PETER'S EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hendrick Home for Children
—
2
Kemmerer Village Inc

To provide a wide range of quality services to children and families who face stress and turmoil in their lives.

Human Services
3
Health Care & Rehabilitation Services of Southeastern Vt Inc

Hcrs' mission is to provide creative, collaborative, and compassionate health care services that are responsive to the needs of our communities.

Health
4
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
5
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
6
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
7
Ranch Hands Rescue

To provide a sanctuary for people and animals, founded on hope and healing for the long-term recovery of trauma victims, special needs animals, and male survivors of sex trafficking.

Animals
8
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
9
Kings Ranch of Jonesboro Inc

King's ranch is a privately funded, nonprofit, nondenominational christian children's home organized to provide hope for adopted children and their families who are at risk of disruption because of the trauma the child incurred from abuse,…

Human Services
10
Kennebec Valley Mental Health Cente D/B/a Kennebec Behavioral Health

The mission of kennebec behavioral health is to promote the well-being of children, adults and familiies who experience mental illness, emotional or developmental difficulties, or behavioral challenges.

Health
11
Henderson County Help Center Inc

To develop programs for the support, care, health and well being of the people of henderson county, texas.

Human Services
12
Kershaw County Humane Society

The kershaw county humane society is dedicated to providing food, housing and medical care to all lost or homeless animals. our goal is to reunite pets with their owners and to address the root causes of animal abuse and overpopulation…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hill Country Crisis Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Art 2 Heart. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIOPREGNANCY RESOUCRE CENTER: $45,000 · OtherPREGNANCY RESOUCRE CENTERCHRISTIAN MENS JOB CORPS: $20,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN MENS JOB CORPSIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORPS: $15,000 · OtherHILL COUNTRY CRISIS COUNCIL INC: $14,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO KENNETH ALAN HOVEY MEMORIAL: $14,000 · OtherGLORY COMMUNITY GARDEN: $11,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $10,000 · Other+16 more: $93,000 · Other+16 moreARMS OF HOPE: $20,000 · Human ServicesARMS OF HOPEChristian Assistance Ministry: $19,000 · Human ServicesChristian Assistanc…HILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $14,000 · Human ServicesHILL COUNTRY YOUTH …KERR KONNECT: $11,000 · Human ServicesKERR KONNECTPATHWAYS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesPATHWAYS YOUTH AND …ELEVATE ADULT EDUCATION INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesELEVATE ADULT EDUCA…K STAR INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesK STAR INCART 2 HEART: $6,000 · Human ServicesART 2 HEARTHILL COUNTRY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesHILL COUNTRY COUNCI…HILL COUNTRY VETERANS CENTER: $45,000 · Public BenefitHILL COUNT…VETERANS ASSISTANCE DOGS OF TEXAS INC: $6,000 · Public BenefitVETERANS A…KERRVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $46,881 · EducationKERRVILLE…CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (: $15,000 · HealthSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $11,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · HealthHILL COUNTRY CASA INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsKERR COUNTY CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL: $10,000 · Civil RightsHILL COUNTRY DISTRICT JRLIVESTOCK: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$282,000Human Services$94,000Public Benefit$51,000Education$46,881Health$32,000Civil Rights$25,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKERRVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $46,881 over 1y, 12% of budgetARMS OF HOPE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetChristian Assistance Ministry: $19,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL (: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHILL COUNTRY CASA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHILL COUNTRY CRISIS COUNCIL INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCH: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKERR KONNECT: $11,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetSIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKERR COUNTY CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHILL COUNTRY DISTRICT JRLIVESTOCK: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPATHWAYS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE ADULT EDUCATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetK STAR INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COMING KING FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetART 2 HEART: $6,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetHILL COUNTRY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIETERT CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVETERANS ASSISTANCE DOGS OF TEXAS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hal & Charlie Peterso…The Community Foundat…Floyd a & Kathleen C …Perry & Ruby Stevens …Harvey E Najim Charit…Kerr County United WaySterling-Turner Found…San Antonio Food BankFirstDay FoundationRay C Fish FoundationThe Moody FoundationSan Antonio Area Foun…
Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation & Fd Mgmt TrustTX36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation & Fd Mgmt Trust · The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · Floyd a & Kathleen C Cailloux Foundation · Perry & Ruby Stevens Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Kerr County United Way · Sterling-Turner Foundation · San Antonio Food Bank · FirstDay Foundation · Ray C Fish Foundation · The Moody Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Green Umbrella Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Green Umbrella Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Green Umbrella’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home