Skip to content
Green Charitable Fdn Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Green Charitable Fdn Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$688k
Granted FY2025still arriving
41
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.3MHealth$1.1MHousing & Shelter$690kCivil Rights$472kInternational$328kHuman Services$265kReligion$256kCrime & Legal$173kOther$0
02FY2025 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $103k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $284k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEACHERS COLLEGE$150,000
MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
JASA$50,000
NEW SCHOOL UNIVERSITY$40,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$40,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$35,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$30,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNTOLD NEWS$25,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$24,200
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$20,000
BROOKLYN BOTANICAL GARDENS$10,000
HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATION$6,000
FRIENDS OF GUEST HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOMESTRETCH: $10k → 4%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%HOMESTRETCH: $5k → 4%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%HOMESTRETCH: $5k → 4%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%HOMESTRETCH: $5k → 4%HOMESTRETCH: $5k → 4%HOMESTRETCH: $5k → 4%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%HOMESTRETCH: $5k → 4%HOMESTRETCH: $5k → 4%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%HOMELESS CHILDRENS PLAYTIME PROJECT: $5k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $5k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $5k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $5k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $5k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $5k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $3k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $2k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $2k → 14%SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK: $1k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%IONA SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 14%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 54 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
8

Total granted

$6.2M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+30%

Still filing today

74%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Teachers College Columbia University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +7%
  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $835k · revenue +59%
  • JC
    JASA CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $521k · revenue ×11

Funded once

  • AG
    AP GIANNINI PARENT TEACHER ASSN
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • KC
    KERNOCHAN CENTER FOR LAW ARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
6
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
7
Harvard Club of Washington Dc

To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.

Education
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement; the most unlike its peers is The National Museum of Women in the Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
36/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Teachers College Columbia University: $1,475,000 · EducationTeachers College Columbia UniversityThe New School: $360,000 · EducationThe New SchoolBARNARD COLLEGE: $300,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGEJ KIRBY SIMON FOREIGN SERVICE TRUST: $120,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $91,000 · Education+2 more: $14,000 · EducationMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $835,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CE…CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $285,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTI…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $45,000 · Health+1 more: $33,000 · HealthIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…CONGREGATION EMANUEL: $194,815 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANUELACCESS TO JUSTICE LAB AT HLS: $90,000 · OtherACCESS TO JUSTICE LAB A…WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $61,310 · OtherPILF AT COLUMBIA INC: $60,000 · OtherBROOKLYN BOTANICAL GARDENS: $60,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL CTR FOR LAW ME: $50,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · OtherSOME INC: $45,000 · OtherTHRIVE DC: $45,000 · OtherMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $45,000 · OtherHOUSE OF RUTH: $45,000 · Other+30 more: $329,000 · Other+30 moreJASA CORPORATION: $521,000 · Community ImprovementJASA CORPO…COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $45,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY …ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $285,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $180,000 · Civil RightsUNTOLD NEWS: $195,000 · InternationalTHE ASIA SOCIETY: $12,000 · International+2 more: $7,885 · InternationalHomestretch Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesIona Senior Services: $45,000 · Human ServicesHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $45,000 · Human ServicesSASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC: $33,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $7,000 · Human Services
Education$2,360,000Health$1,198,000Other$1,320,125Community Improvement$566,000Civil Rights$465,000International$214,885Human Services$175,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $1,475,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $835,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJASA CORPORATION: $521,000 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetThe New School: $360,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $300,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $285,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $285,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNTOLD NEWS: $195,000 over 9y, 58% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $180,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJ KIRBY SIMON FOREIGN SERVICE TRUST: $120,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $91,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE DC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHomestretch Inc: $45,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSOME INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetIona Senior Services: $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $45,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING UNLIMITED INC: $34,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC: $33,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC: $33,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGENERATION HOPE: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON LITERACY CENTER: $9,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTOWN HALL FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAPPEAL OF CONSCIENCE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN AND EDWARD MACDOWELL INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST NATIVE-AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $5,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHEALDSBURG JAZZ FESTIVAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WOMEN IN THE ARTS: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHINA INSTITUTE IN AMERICA INCORPORATED: $885 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JASA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds The New School ↗
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds UNTOLD NEWS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds J KIRBY SIMON FOREIGN SERVICE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE DC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
  • Who funds Homestretch Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Iona Senior Services ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASIA SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION HOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Co…United Way of the Nat…The Morris and Gwendo…John Edward Fowler Me…William S Abell Found…Dimick Foundation Joh…Nora Roberts Foundati…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Silicon Valley Commun…Morgan Stanley Global…
Greater Washington Community FoundationDC21.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Nora Roberts Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Green Charitable Fdn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Green Charitable Fdn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Green Charitable Fdn Inc?

Find your warmest path to Green Charitable Fdn Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Green Charitable Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home