Skip to content
Greekfest Charity Gala Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Greekfest Charity Gala Inc

Our mission is to serve others in need by raising awareness and support of identified charities, both local and orthodox christian ministries, thouhgh a broad based community collaboration and collective serving in concert.

$84k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$401kReligion$229kHealth$146kEducation$40k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$44,133
Median grant
2
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECUMENICAL PATRIARCH BARTHOLOMEW$44,133
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$40,133
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $144k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NEST OF MOBILE: $36k → 19%NEST OF MOBILE: $34k → 19%PENELOPE HOUSE: $40k → 19%PENELOPE HOUSE: $34k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$559k · 4 repeat orgs$257k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$559k
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PENELOPE HOUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $331k · revenue +26%
  • EP
    Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $88k · revenue +75%
  • TN
    THE NEST CORPORATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $70k · revenue +108% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • OC
    ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2022 · $103k · revenue -14% · 30% of their budget
  • PP
    PRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +1%
  • DR
    DIAKONIA RETREAT CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Divine Mercy Ministries Inc

Divine Mercy Ministries, Inc. is a Christian maternity home for women 18 years of age and older facing unexpected pregnancies. Open to women of all faiths, it provides a loving and nurturing environment to meet the spiritual, physical,…

Religion
2
Paris Pregnancy Care Center Inc

To provide assistance to women with crisis pregnancies. the centers are committed to provide their clients with accurate and complete information about both prenatal development and abortion.

Health
3
Vero Beach Crisis Pregnancy Ctr

Care net pregnancy center of indian river is a christ-centered ministry that builds upon the biblical principles of the sanctity of human life, sexual purity and adoption. care net is committed to providing compassionate help and practical…

Health
4
Atlanta Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

To share the truth and compassion of jesus christ, support life-affirming choices and promote healthy relationships by serving and caring for women and families in pregnancy-related circumstances

—
5
Palouse Care Network Inc

We are a Christian Organization that provides confidential and compassionate care in the form of specialized medical, practical and spiritual support to those facing pregnancy, parenting, sexuality and abortion related issues.

Health
6
Pregnancy Support Center of Carroll County Inc

To provide pregnancy support, medical information, pregnancy testing, limited obstetrical ultrasound, and parenting instruction for individuals confronted with an unexpected pregnancy. Our care for women is given, all to the Glory of God!

Human Services
7
Care Net Pregnancy Center of the Hudson Valley

Care net pregnancy center works to give free, confidential coaching and support in a comforting environment. the organization is there to help women develop positive solutions during an unintended pregnancy.

Health
8
Pregnancy Resource Clinic of Clark County Inc

The pregnancy resource clinic is a christ-centered organization that provides trusted care, support, and resources to all people regarding pregnancy and sexual health.

Health
9
Nest Pregnancy Care Center Inc
Religion
10
Pregnancy Resource Center of Athens County Inc

The PRC provides holistic, life-affirming, Christ-centered education, counsel, medical services, material assistance, and spiritual support, to men, women, and families with sexual health, pregnancy, pregnancy loss, mothering, fathering,…

—
11
Christle Lighthouse Pcc Inc

Our mission is to share the life saving gospel of Jesus Christ- Minister the Love of God to Women in Crisis Pregnanicies to not Abort, Promote traditional Christian Family Morals & Values

Health
12
Care Net Manasota Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

To meet the physical, emotional, and spiritual challenges of women facing an untimely pregnancy, and minister to men and women based on their needs.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orthodox Christian Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Victory Health Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENELOPE HOUSE INC: $331,192 · Human ServicesPENELOPE HOUSE INCTHE NEST CORPORATION INC: $69,900 · Human ServicesTHE NEST CORPORATION INCORTHODOX CHRISTIAN NETWORK INC: $102,978 · ReligionORTHODOX CHRISTIAN NETWORK…Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc: $88,347 · ReligionEcumenical Patriarch Barth…THE LEARNING TREE INC: $69,900 · OtherTHE LEARNING T…DIAKONIA RETREAT CENTER: $37,500 · OtherDIAKONIA RETRE…Womens Resource Center Inc: $40,133 · Civil RightsPRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $40,000 · EducationVictory Health Partners Inc: $35,901 · Health
Human Services$401,092Religion$191,325Other$107,400Civil Rights$40,133Education$40,000Health$35,901

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENELOPE HOUSE INC: $331,192 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetORTHODOX CHRISTIAN NETWORK INC: $102,978 over 1y, 30% of budgetEcumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc: $88,347 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE NEST CORPORATION INC: $69,900 over 2y, 35% of budgetTHE LEARNING TREE INC: $69,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWomens Resource Center Inc: $40,133 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPRICHARD PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetVictory Health Partners Inc: $35,901 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Catranis Family C…The Miller Charitable…Mayer & Arlene Mitche…Rjjb Family FoundationCd Helen and Jeff Gla…Crampton Trust #12550…The Daniel Foundation…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Catranis Family Charitable Foundation IncAL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Catranis Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Miller Charitable Foundation Inc · Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Rjjb Family Foundation · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Greekfest Charity Gala Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Greekfest Charity Gala Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $11k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greekfest Charity Gala’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home