Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Alabama · Public charity

Greekfest Charity Gala Inc

Our mission is to serve others in need by raising awareness and support of identified charities, both local and orthodox christian ministries, thouhgh a broad based community collaboration and collective serving in concert.

$84k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$44,133
Largest grant, FY2024
$44,133
Organizations funded a year
1 to 3
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$5k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Greekfest Charity Gala Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 53% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving2$84k50%
FY20232$83k50%
FY20222$206k50%
FY20211$115k0%
FY20193$108k33%
FY20183$102k67%
FY20173$118kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$401kReligion$229kHealth$146kEducation$40k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Penelope House Inc$331,19253%
Orthodox Christian Network Inc$102,978130%
Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc$88,34732%
The Nest Corporation Inc$69,900235%
The Learning Tree Inc$69,90020%
Womens Resource Center Inc$40,13314%
Prichard Preparatory School Inc$40,00013%
Victory Health Partners Inc$35,90112%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($38k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Greekfest Charity Gala Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPenelope House Inc: $331,192 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetOrthodox Christian Network Inc: $102,978 over 1y, 30% of budgetEcumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc: $88,347 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetThe Nest Corporation Inc: $69,900 over 2y, 35% of budgetThe Learning Tree Inc: $69,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWomens Resource Center Inc: $40,133 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetPrichard Preparatory School Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetVictory Health Partners Inc: $35,901 over 1y, 2.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Catranis Family C…The Miller Charitable…Mayer & Arlene Mitche…Rjjb Family FoundationCd Helen and Jeff Gla…Crampton Trust #12550…The Daniel Foundation…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Catranis Family Charitable Foundation IncAL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Catranis Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Miller Charitable Foundation Inc · Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation · Rjjb Family Foundation · Cd Helen and Jeff Glaze Foundation · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Greekfest Charity Gala Inc with peer funders

About Greekfest Charity Gala Inc

How much does Greekfest Charity Gala Inc give?
Greekfest Charity Gala Inc reported 2 grants totaling $84,266 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 3 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Greekfest Charity Gala Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (49%), Religion (28%), Health (18%).
Who are Greekfest Charity Gala Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Penelope House Inc ($331k), Orthodox Christian Network Inc ($103k), Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew Foundation Inc ($88k).
Does Greekfest Charity Gala Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Greekfest Charity Gala Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Catranis Family Charitable Foundation Inc, The Miller Charitable Foundation Inc, Mayer & Arlene Mitchell Charitable Foundation.
Where is Greekfest Charity Gala Inc based?
Greekfest Charity Gala Inc is based in AL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $11k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greekfest Charity Gala’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home