· Public charity
Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc
Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and empower our residents to strengthen the Baybrook community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $643,423 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $730,888 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $87,465 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $138k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $494k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Arundel Community Services | $227,466 |
| City of Refuge Baltimore Inc | $206,082 |
| Royston Mueller McLean & Reid | $60,000 |
| Rehoboth Church of Deliveran | $39,495 |
| I AM MENtality | $30,380 |
| The Complete Player Charity | $28,000 |
| Lawyers Express Trust LLC | $15,000 |
| Cotton Duck Title Co | $15,000 |
| CLA Title and Escrow | $10,000 |
| Blue Water Baltimore | $6,000 |
| Grow Home | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCITY OF REFUGE BALTIMORE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +115%
- ACARUNDEL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +89%
- DADRINK AT THE WELL INC2× · 2023–2024 · $105k · revenue +75%
Funded once
- SBSOUTH BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +162% · 26% of their budget
- JCJ C Porter Construction LLCone grant, 2024 · $166k
- SASparks at Play LLCone grant, 2021 · $103k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
To promote, strengthen, and advocate for the community development sector throughout Marylands urban, suburban, and rural communities.
The mission of baltimore community lending is supporting the revitalization and strengthening of underserved communities in the greater baltimore region through innovative financial solutions and collaborative resources designed to promote…
Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…
To help baltimore communities forge strong connections among neighbors to market their communities, increase home values and create high standards for property improvement. using its capacity to attract and invest public and private…
Baltimore Green Space is a land trust that partners with communities to preserve and support community gardens , forest patches , pocket parks , and other community-managed spaces.
The baltimore regional housing partnership expands housing choices for low-income families who have historically been excluded from housing in well-resourced areas.
The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.
Live baltimores mission is to recruit and retain baltimore city residents.
Maryland new directions' mission is to train and coach people facing career and life transitions to overcome barriers, restore self-belief, and acquire the skills and tools needed to secure employment on a path to a living wage.
Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…
Continue to provide programs that assist low income families with purchasing & rehabilitation of affordable housing.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arundel Community Development Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grow Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITY OF REFUGE BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds ARUNDEL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BALTIMORE COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds DRINK AT THE WELL INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds I AM MENTALITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMPLETE PLAYER CHARITY LTD ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLUE WATER BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds Grow Home Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Chesapeake Bay Trust · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Sb7 Coalition Inc · Family League of Baltimore City Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Neighborhood Housing Services of Baltimore Inc — 76% of income from government
- Living Classrooms Foundation — 9% of income from government
- Blue Water Baltimore — 5% of income from government
- Arundel Community Development Services Inc — 2% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.