Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Grassroots International Inc

To connect people in the u.s.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$413k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$4.6MFood & Nutrition$2.7MCivil Rights$2.5MCommunity Improvement$1000kPublic Safety & Disaster$628kEmployment$361kCrime & Legal$295kPublic Benefit$252kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $1,467,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,020,650 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,552,750 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $340k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $715k
  • $250k+1 grant · $413k
$30,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSTITUTO PARA LA INVESTIGACIN Y ACCIN EN AGROECOLOGA$412,900
TIDES CENTER$175,000
HASER$140,000
GLOBAL JUSTICE ECOLOGY PROJECT$95,000
US CAMPAIGN FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS$95,000
INSTITUTE FOR SOCIO- ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH$90,000
COMEDORES SOCIALES DE PUERTO RICO$60,000
FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVESLAND ASSISTANCE FUND$60,000
INDIGENOUS ENV NETWORK$45,000
GRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE$40,000
EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE$30,000
COLECTIVO IL$30,000
NATIONAL FAMILY FARM COALITION$30,000
WHYHUNGER$30,000
EYEWITNESS PALESTINE$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 60% of grant dollars ($7.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 40% that went abroad ($5.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $738k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%THE CENTER POLE: $45k → 23%TIDES CENTER: $175k → 10%DOMESTIC WORKERS UNITED: $10k → 20%LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE INC: $50k → 14%NATURE'S GARDEN FOR VICTORY & PEACE: $49k → 32%HARAMBEE HOUSE: $50k → 16%TIDES CENTER: $74k → 10%DOMESTIC WORKERS UNITED: $9k → 20%LA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE: $50k → 14%HARAMBEE HOUSE INC: $35k → 16%Tides Center: $50k → 10%Domestic Workers United: $9k → 20%LA PLAZITA INSTITUTE: $49k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $35k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $23k → 10%Tides Center: $15k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US — 40% of all-years giving ($5.2M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Puerto Rico$5.2M · 59 grants
Guam$25k · 1 grant

Grants abroad, by region — $8.5M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$2.4M · 28% · 16 grants

Stated purpose: MENTAL HEALTH · LGBTQ RIGHTS · AGRICULTURAL RECOVER

Central America and the Caribbean$1.8M · 21% · 22 grants

Stated purpose: INDIGENOUS RIGHTS · HEALTH INITIATIVE · PEOPLES RIGHTS

South America$1.4M · 16% · 19 grants

Stated purpose: INDIGENEOUS RIGHTS · HUMAN RIGHTS · FARMERS RIGHTS

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.0M · 12% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: SMALL FARMERS RIGHTS · RURAL PEOPLES RIGHTS · GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY

Sub-Saharan Africa$881k · 10% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: SUSTAINABLE AGRICULT · Womens rights · PROTECTION OF FOREST

South Asia$673k · 8% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: HUMAN RIGHTS · RURAL SUPPORT · LGBTQ RIGHTS

North America (Canada and Mexico)$351k · 4% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: Education · Indigenous rights · CIVIL RIGHTS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Grassroots International Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Grassroots International Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 40% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 57 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +125% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

57 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
61

Total granted

$11M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+125%
+43%

Still filing today

88%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionEmploymentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    APOYO LEGAL AL EMPRENDIMIENTO COMUNITARIO INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.7M · revenue ×94
  • IE
    INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +51%
  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $530k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • LC
    LA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +17%
  • SF
    SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -62%
  • NG
    NATURES GARDEN FOR VICTORY AND PEACE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $49k · revenue +91% · 38% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Environmental Justice Alliance

Our mission is to fight against fossil fuel executives and industries that have turned our communities into dumping grounds for toxic waste, poisoning our air, water, lan, and bodies. We organize to oppose giant oil refineries, dirty…

Environment
2
Nature for Justice

To empower frontline communities to lead nature-based solutions that advance climate justice, ecosystem restoration, and resilient livelihoods through connecting locally-led initiatives to funding, markets, and technical support.

Environment
3
Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice

Greenaction mobilizes community power to win victories that change govenment and corporate policies and practices to protect health and promote environmental, economic and social justice.

Environment
4
Educator Collective for Envionmental Justice Inc

Environmental Justice & Equality

Education
5
Earthworks

The Corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes. Earthworks is dedicated to protecting communities and the environment from the impacts of irresponsible mineral and energy development while seeking…

Public Benefit
6
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
7
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
8
Center for Contemporary Documentation Inc
Philanthropy
9
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
10
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
11
Central Valley Partnership

The Central Valley Partnership (CVP) conducts and collaborates in training initiatives, including community organizer training, education on labor history and issues, messaging workshops, etc., aimed at fostering the establishment of new…

Civil Rights
12
Taproot Earth

Taproot Earth works with communities to support strategies around the use of water, energy and land.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Appalachian Development Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsCommunity Food PantriesFood Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Construc…Developmental Disabilities …Affordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyLocal Food System Organizat…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%43%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%3%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/119
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,446

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
50
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/100
Grantees still filing
80/100
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IALA — $1,022,300 · OtherIALANational Save The Family Farm Coalition — $232,000 · OtherCOMEDORES SOCIALES DE PUERTO RICO INC — $429,150 · OtherCOMEDORES SOCIALES DE PUERTO RICO INCEducation For Just Peace in Middle East — $185,000 · Other+61 more — $2,724,275 · Other+61 moreSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $530,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONM…INSTITUTE FOR SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH — $464,250 · EnvironmentINSTITUTE FOR SOCIO…Earth Island Institute Inc — $123,000 · EnvironmentEarth Island Instit…GLOBAL JUSTICE ECOLOGY PROJECT INC — $95,000 · EnvironmentCOMING CLEAN INC — $94,000 · EnvironmentEAST MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION COUNCIL INC — $80,000 · Environment+22 more — $859,500 · Environment+22 moreAPOYO LEGAL AL EMPRENDIMIENTO COMUNITARIO INC — $1,697,500 · Crime & LegalAPOYO LEGAL AL…+1 more — $20,000 · Crime & LegalCOORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MUJER INC — $510,500 · Human ServicesCOORDINADORA…TIDES CENTER — $382,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERLA PLAZITA INSTITUTE — $99,000 · Human ServicesLA PLAZITA I…Harambee House Inc — $85,000 · Human ServicesHarambee Hou…COOPERATION JACKSON OF MISSISSIPPI — $74,000 · Human ServicesCOLECTIVO ILE CORPORACION — $60,000 · Human ServicesLA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE — $50,000 · Human ServicesNATURES GARDEN FOR VICTORY AND PEACE INC — $49,000 · Human Services+4 more — $118,000 · Human Services+4 moreINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $1,182,654 · EducationINDIGENOUS…THE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $45,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationGRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE — $1,030,020 · Civil RightsGRASSROOT…+2 more — $50,000 · Civil RightsHASER Inc — $431,800 · Community ImprovementPUEBLO ORGANIZADO EN DEFENSA DE LA TIERRA Y SUS RECURSOS — $104,000 · Community ImprovementCENTRO POR LA JUSTICIA — $94,000 · Community ImprovementALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT INC — $72,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE MOVEMENT — $65,000 · Community ImprovementSOCIETY OF NATIVE NATIONS — $28,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $39,500 · Community Improvement
Other$4,592,725Environment$2,245,750Crime & Legal$1,717,500Human Services$1,427,500Education$1,237,654Civil Rights$1,080,020Community Improvement$834,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $1,182,654 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetGRASSROOTS GLOBAL JUSTICE — $1,030,020 over 8y, 14% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $530,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MUJER INC — $510,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH — $464,250 over 5y, 21% of budgetHASER Inc — $431,800 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetCOMEDORES SOCIALES DE PUERTO RICO INC — $429,150 over 6y, 21% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $382,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNational Save The Family Farm Coalition — $232,000 over 8y, 10.0% of budgetEducation For Just Peace in Middle East — $185,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetFEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES — $145,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc — $123,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for the study of the Americas — $115,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetPUEBLO ORGANIZADO EN DEFENSA DE LA TIERRA Y SUS RECURSOS — $104,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetFuerza Unida — $104,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetGLOBAL JUSTICE ECOLOGY PROJECT INC — $95,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCENTRO POR LA JUSTICIA — $94,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetCOMING CLEAN INC — $94,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetDream of Wild Health — $89,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetHarambee House Inc — $85,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR WASHINGTONS FUTURE — $84,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetAGITARTE INC — $80,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetEAST MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION COUNCIL INC — $80,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetAYUDA LEGAL PUERTO RICO INC — $80,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetWHYHUNGER INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS INC — $74,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetAINA MOMONA — $74,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetJUST TRANSITION ALLIANCE — $74,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetCOOPERATION JACKSON OF MISSISSIPPI — $74,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT INC — $72,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $69,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $65,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGWICHIN STEERING COMMITTEE — $64,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetEAST YARD COMMUNITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE — $64,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCOLECTIVO ILE CORPORACION — $60,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUPROSE INC — $58,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN MARINE ALLIANCE INC — $55,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $54,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST RESEARCH & INFORMATION CENTER — $54,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetLA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE — $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMiami Workers Center Inc — $49,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNATURES GARDEN FOR VICTORY AND PEACE INC — $49,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetFarmworker Association of Florida Inc — $49,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGot Green — $45,500 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetCenter Pole — $45,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUrban Tilth — $45,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Social and Environmen…Amalgamated Charitabl…Movement Strategy Cen…Solutions Project IncWindward FundNatural Resources Def…PatagoniaorgCommon Counsel Founda…Tides CenterThe Schmidt Family Fo…United States Energy …Rsf Social Finance Inc
Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) IncCA108.7× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Movement Strategy Center · Solutions Project Inc · Windward Fund · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · Patagoniaorg · Common Counsel Foundation · Tides Center · The Schmidt Family Foundation · United States Energy Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Grassroots International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • The Education & Training Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
  • Ourspace World Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home