· Private foundation
Grassland Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $270k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $255k
- $250k+1 grant · $410k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES | $410,000 |
| FAITH GRACE INC | $110,000 |
| SPECIAL K RANCH | $75,000 |
| MOUNT OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCH | $70,000 |
| LAKE HAVASU CITY HOSPICE | $40,000 |
| LAKE HAVASU SENIOR CENTER | $40,000 |
| LHC FELLOWSHIP HALL INC | $20,262 |
| PARK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER | $20,000 |
| ADRIAN COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| LIVINGSTON FOOD RESOURCE | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH | $20,000 |
| HAVASU COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| LAKE HAVASU FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| GOD'S PRECIOUS CHILDREN | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- GHGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES2× · 2024–2025 · $790k · revenue +8%
- PCPARK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +16%
- GPGOD'S PRECIOUS CHILDREN INC2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- GHGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIESone grant, 2022 · $95k
- RHREDMON HOUSE INCone grant, 2019 · $60k
- GIGRACE-FAITH INCone grant, 2019 · $50k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Addiction treatment center
Provide housing and residential care for recovering alcoholic
Our mission is to provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.
To provide a safe and healthy environment for the alcoholic/addict and their families to find recovery and outpatient addiction treatment services
A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.
To provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.
Alcohol drug rehab and halfway house.
Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.
To provide a safe, sober, and structured environment for women in recovery. the goal is to promote academic, occupational, emotional and spiritual competence resulting in measurable progress toward personal fulfillment and positive…
Transitional housing for parole individuals and drug and alcohol rehabilitation for those in need
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL K RANCH ↗
- Who funds LAKE HAVASU FELLOWSHIP HALL INC ↗
- Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PARK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds HAVASU COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF HAVASU INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S PRECIOUS CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds VINCE GRANT HALL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Grassland Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grassland Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Grassland’s filings →