Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Grassland Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$940k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$1.3MInternational$900kHuman Services$250kHealth$149kEducation$73kHousing & Shelter$60kFood & Nutrition$55kArts & Culture$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $270k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $255k
  • $250k+1 grant · $410k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES$410,000
FAITH GRACE INC$110,000
SPECIAL K RANCH$75,000
MOUNT OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCH$70,000
LAKE HAVASU CITY HOSPICE$40,000
LAKE HAVASU SENIOR CENTER$40,000
LHC FELLOWSHIP HALL INC$20,262
LIVINGSTON FOOD RESOURCE$20,000
PARK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER$20,000
LAKE HAVASU FOOD BANK$20,000
AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,000
ADRIAN COLLEGE$20,000
HAVASU COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LINCOLN SENIOR CENTER: $10k → 11%VINCE GRANT HALL INC: $5k → 10%VINCE GRANT HALL INC: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
MN
IL
MI
PA
CA
AZ
KS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 18 repeat orgs$659k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
25

Total granted

$2.2M
$529k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

33%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’24’25
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $790k · revenue 0%
  • MO
    MT OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    2× · 2019–2022 · $583k
  • MO
    MOUNT OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $260k

Funded once

  • GH
    GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2022 · $95k
  • RH
    REDMON HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • FI
    FAITH-GRACE INC.
    one grant, 2022 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Golden Spike Treatment Ranch Inc

Addiction treatment center

2
Alco Halfway House

Provide housing and residential care for recovering alcoholic

3
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

Our mission is to provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.

4
Alano House

To provide a safe and healthy environment for the alcoholic/addict and their families to find recovery and outpatient addiction treatment services

5
River Bend Recovery

A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.

Health
6
Lubbock Lutheran Retirement Corporation

To provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.

7
Harbor House Inc

Alcohol drug rehab and halfway house.

Health
8
Living Center Inc

Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.

9
Healthy House

To provide a safe, sober, and structured environment for women in recovery. the goal is to promote academic, occupational, emotional and spiritual competence resulting in measurable progress toward personal fulfillment and positive…

Human Services
10
Hope Help and Healing

Transitional housing for parole individuals and drug and alcohol rehabilitation for those in need

Health
11
The Home for the Aged
12
Job Haines Home for Aged People

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Havasu Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Chemical Dependency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
4/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MT OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCH — $583,000 · OtherMT OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCHMOUNT OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCH — $260,000 · OtherMOUNT OLIVE LUTHERAN CHURCHFAITH GRACE INC — $200,000 · OtherFAITH GRACE INCSPECIAL K RANCH — $100,000 · OtherGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES — $95,000 · Other+35 more — $689,262 · Other+35 moreGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES — $790,000 · InternationalGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES+1 more — $15,000 · InternationalLAKE HAVASU FELLOWSHIP HALL INC — $40,500 · HealthSOUTHWEST CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY — $7,500 · HealthADRIAN COLLEGE — $40,000 · EducationHAVASU COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyLINCOLN SENIOR CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesVINCE GRANT HALL INC — $8,000 · Human Services
Other$1,927,262International$805,000Health$48,000Education$40,000Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES — $790,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetSPECIAL K RANCH — $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER — $30,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetHOSPICE OF HAVASU INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGOD'S PRECIOUS CHILDREN INC — $15,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetVINCE GRANT HALL INC — $8,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetSOUTHWEST CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH MINISTRIES
  • Who funds SPECIAL K RANCH
  • Who funds LAKE HAVASU FELLOWSHIP HALL INC
  • Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds PARK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER
  • Who funds HAVASU COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF HAVASU INC
  • Who funds GOD'S PRECIOUS CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds LINCOLN SENIOR CENTER
  • Who funds VINCE GRANT HALL INC
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Grassland Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph