Skip to content
Grand Victoria Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Grand Victoria Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$6.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
114
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$555k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Environment$10MCommunity Improvement$6.5MCivil Rights$5.3MHuman Services$3.8MEducation$3.3MPhilanthropy$2.9MEmployment$2.6MArts & Culture$2.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 114 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $88k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $907k
  • $50k–250k46 grants · $4.7M
  • $250k+2 grants · $805k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$181M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Crossroads Fund$555,150
Chicago Votes Education Fund$250,000
Southsiders Organized for Unity and Liberation$226,500
Hamilton Wings$212,500
Metropolitan Family Services$176,500
Black Oaks Center$175,000
United Congregations of Metro East$175,000
East Side Aligned$161,500
Grassroots Collaborative$151,500
Shriver Center on Poverty Law$150,000
Chicago Jobs Council$150,000
WEPOWER$150,000
Communities United$125,000
Raise the Floor Alliance$125,000
YWCA Elgin$121,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Partnership For Resilience: $75k → 7%MANO A MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $100k → 8%Mano a Mano Family Resource Center: $100k → 8%Mano a Mano Family Resource Center: $100k → 8%MANO A MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $100k → 8%Latino Union of Chicago: $75k → 14%Latino Union of Chicago: $65k → 14%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF NORTHERN ILL: $25k → 6%Latino Union of Chicago: $50k → 14%Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Northern Ill: $25k → 6%LATINO UNION OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%LATINO UNION OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%Association for Individual Development: $30k → 8%Association for Individual Development: $30k → 8%HANA CENTER: $130k → 14%HANA Center: $120k → 14%HANA CENTER: $100k → 14%HANA Center: $100k → 14%HANA Center: $50k → 14%HANA CENTER: $25k → 14%HANA Center: $25k → 14%Association for Individual Development: $30k → 8%Association for Individual Development: $30k → 8%Marklund Children's Home: $25k → 8%MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME: $25k → 8%Metropolitan Family Services: $177k → 14%Association for Individual Development: $25k → 8%Children's Home & Aid: $95k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID: $70k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME & AID: $50k → 14%Metropolitan Family Services: $50k → 14%Children's Home & Aid: $45k → 14%Children's Home Aid: $45k → 14%mRelief: $40k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR RESILIENCE: $60k → 14%Partnership For Resilience: $60k → 14%PARTNERSHIP FOR RESILIENCE: $60k → 14%Partnership For Resilience: $60k → 14%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $105k → 14%YWCA Elgin: $121k → 14%YWCA Elgin: $86k → 14%YWCA ELGIN: $49k → 14%YWCA Elgin: $35k → 14%YWCA Elgin: $35k → 14%YWCA Elgin: $30k → 14%MRELIEF: $40k → 14%mRelief: $40k → 14%mRelief: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
IN
CA
MO
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41M · 154 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

154 repeat relationships: 91 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

154
83

Total granted

$41M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+6%

Still filing today

84%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $271k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JD
    JO DAVIESS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +182% · 25% of their budget
  • F
    FOREFRONT
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +179%
  • TC
    THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
  • WE
    WOMEN EMPLOYED
    one grant, 2018 · $127k · revenue -14%
  • YI
    YOUNG INVINCIBLES
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Votes

Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…

Civil Rights
2
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
3
Chicago Cultural Alliance

The Chicago Cultural Alliances mission is to connect, promote, and support centers of cultural heritage for a more inclusive Chicago. We are an active consortium of 50 cultural heritage museums, centers, and historical societies that…

Arts & Culture
4
The Partnership for College Completion

The Partnership for College Completion (PCC) champions policies, practices, and systems that increase college completion and eliminate degree completion disparities for low-income, first generation, and students of color in Illinois…

Education
5
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
6
Chicago United

To achieve parity in economic opportunity for people of color by advancing multiracial leadership in corporate governance, expanding the talent pipline for executive-level management, and growing minority businesses.

Philanthropy
7
Local Economic and Employment Development Council Inc

North Branch Works is a membership-supported nonprofit neighborhood organization that for more than three decades has promoted balanced, job-creating economic development along the North Branch of the Chicago River.

Employment
8
Executive Service Corps of Chicago

Executive Service Corps is the premier nonprofit consultancy that engages highly skilled professionals who use their experience and expertise to provide nonprofits with the consulting services they need to be successful. Our vision is to…

Community Improvement
9
Public Interest Law Initiative

PILI engages, inspires and empowers those advancing equal access to justice.

Crime & Legal
10
Chicago Refugee Coalition

The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.

Human Services
11
Chicago Committee On Minorities in Large Law Firms

The chicago committee seeks racial and ethnic diversity in the legal profession by collaborating with its law firm and corporate membership to: drive sustainable institutional change at law firms and corporate legal departments; provide…

Civil Rights
12
Equality Illinois

Equality illinois builds a better illinois by advancing equal treatment and social justice through education, advocacy and protection of the rights of the lgbt community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Humanities Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Neighbors for Environmental Justice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

205 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 205 of the 263 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
64
Early backer (in before they grew)
200/205
Grantees still filing
143/205
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,027,500 · OtherOPENLANDS: $985,805 · OtherChicago Jobs Council: $905,000 · OtherCROSSROADS FUND INC: $726,450 · OtherLATINO POLICY FORUM: $707,500 · OtherFOREFRONT: $1,252,284 · OtherFOREFRONTNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $853,170 · Other+103 more: $13,817,148 · Other+103 moreJO DAVIESS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,775,920 · EnvironmentJO DAVIESS CONSERV…THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $1,055,323 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION F…NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE: $836,401 · EnvironmentNATURAL LAND INSTI…PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK: $574,000 · EnvironmentPRAIRIE RIVERS NET…THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $430,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION F…BLACK OAKS CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE RENEWABLE LIVING: $351,500 · EnvironmentHEARTLANDS CONSERVANCY: $350,000 · EnvironmentILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATION: $310,250 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $290,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $263,500 · Environment+5 more: $867,250 · Environment+5 moreMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $1,700,000 · Community ImprovementMETROPOLITAN…COMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES: $647,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY OR…COMMUNITIES UNITED: $475,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITIES …WEPOWER: $450,000 · Community ImprovementWEPOWERLogan Square Neighborhood Association: $345,000 · Community ImprovementLogan Square…East Side Aligned: $311,500 · Community ImprovementEast Side Al…SMALL BUSINESS MAJORITY FOUNDATION INC: $260,000 · Community ImprovementSMALL BUSINE…WORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO: $250,000 · Community ImprovementBlack Researchers Collective: $226,500 · Community Improvement+4 more: $199,500 · Community ImprovementTHE HANA CENTER: $560,000 · Human ServicesTHE HANA …MANO A MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $400,000 · Human ServicesMANO A MA…The Young Womens Christian Association Elgin Illinois: $395,750 · Human ServicesThe Young…Partnership for Resilience: $323,000 · Human ServicesPartnersh…CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $310,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'…Latino Union of Chicago: $300,000 · Human ServicesLatino Un…Metropolitan Family Services: $255,000 · Human ServicesMetropoli…ASSOCIATION FOR INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT: $208,500 · Human ServicesASSOCIATI…COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $177,167 · Human ServicesmRelief: $165,000 · Human Services+9 more: $470,050 · Human Services+9 moreSCALELIT FKA CHICAGO CITYWIDE LITERACY COALITION: $660,000 · EducationSCALELIT …NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $505,000 · EducationNORTHERN …Grassroots Collaborative: $376,500 · EducationGrassroot…Erikson Institute: $325,000 · EducationErikson I…LINK Unlimited Scholars: $320,000 · EducationLINK Unli…ALIGNMENT COLLABORATIVE FOR EDUCATION INC: $230,667 · EducationALIGNMENT…GROW YOUR OWN ILLINOIS: $215,000 · EducationGROW YOUR…ELGIN YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $206,500 · EducationELGIN YOU…AFRICAN AMERICAN COALITION OF KANE COUNTY INC: $145,000 · EducationYOUTH LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $122,725 · Education+11 more: $381,500 · Education+11 moreHAMILTON WINGS: $889,280 · Arts & CultureSOAPBOX PRODUCTIONS AND ORGANIZING: $266,500 · Arts & CultureILLINOIS HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureLIGHTHOUSE FOUNDATION OF CHICAGOLAND: $225,000 · Arts & CultureGICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureELGIN MASTER CHORALE INC: $170,250 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER: $160,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDRENS THEATRE OF ELGIN & FOX VALLEY THEATRE COMPANY: $134,338 · Arts & CultureELGIN SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $114,000 · Arts & CultureSIDE STREET STUDIO ARTS: $103,000 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $118,400 · Arts & CultureSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW: $1,085,000 · Crime & LegalRAISE THE FLOOR ALLIANCE: $685,000 · Crime & LegalUPSOLVE INC: $190,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$20,274,857Environment$7,104,144Community Improvement$4,865,000Human Services$3,564,467Education$3,487,892Arts & Culture$2,630,768Crime & Legal$1,990,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJO DAVIESS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,775,920 over 7y, 25% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $1,700,000 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetFOREFRONT: $1,252,284 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetSHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW: $1,085,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $1,055,323 over 5y, 20% of budgetOPENLANDS: $985,805 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetChicago Jobs Council: $905,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetHAMILTON WINGS: $889,280 over 6y, 69% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $853,170 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetNATURAL LAND INSTITUTE: $836,401 over 5y, 23% of budgetCROSSROADS FUND INC: $726,450 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetLATINO POLICY FORUM: $707,500 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetRAISE THE FLOOR ALLIANCE: $685,000 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetSCALELIT FKA CHICAGO CITYWIDE LITERACY COALITION: $660,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetCOMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES: $647,500 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS: $620,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES: $600,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetPRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK: $574,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE HANA CENTER: $560,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $505,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetJOBS TO MOVE AMERICA: $504,750 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES UNITED: $475,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetWEPOWER: $450,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $430,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAITH IN PLACE: $430,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetMANO A MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $400,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetFARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $400,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetThe Young Womens Christian Association Elgin Illinois: $395,750 over 7y, 6.1% of budgetSOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION: $391,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetGrassroots Collaborative: $376,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetCO-OP ED CENTER NFP: $375,000 over 4y, 67% of budgetBLACK OAKS CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE RENEWABLE LIVING: $351,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetHEARTLANDS CONSERVANCY: $350,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetLogan Square Neighborhood Association: $345,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetHOUSING HELPERS INC: $334,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetIllinois Action for Children: $332,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetErikson Institute: $325,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED CONGREGATIONS OF METRO EAST: $325,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetPartnership for Resilience: $323,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetLINK Unlimited Scholars: $320,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetTHE LAND CONSERVANCY OF MCHENRY COUNTY: $319,000 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetEast Side Aligned: $311,500 over 3y, 22% of budgetILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL EDUCATION: $310,250 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL: $310,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLatino Union of Chicago: $300,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST: $290,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSOAPBOX PRODUCTIONS AND ORGANIZING: $266,500 over 4y, 32% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $263,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JO DAVIESS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds FOREFRONT ↗
  • Who funds SHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPENLANDS ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Jobs Council ↗
  • Who funds HAMILTON WINGS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL LAND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LATINO POLICY FORUM ↗
  • Who funds RAISE THE FLOOR ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SCALELIT FKA CHICAGO CITYWIDE LITERACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE GREAT LAKES ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE RIVERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE HANA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOBS TO MOVE AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED ↗
  • Who funds WEPOWER ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN PLACE ↗
  • Who funds MANO A MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds The Young Womens Christian Association Elgin Illinois ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION ↗
  • Who funds Grassroots Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds CO-OP ED CENTER NFP ↗
  • Who funds BLACK OAKS CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE RENEWABLE LIVING ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLANDS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Logan Square Neighborhood Association ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING HELPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Action for Children ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Polk Bros Foundation …Field Foundation of I…United Way of Metropo…Lloyd a Fry FoundationRobert R McCormick Fo…Woods Fund of ChicagoThe Chicago Community…Chicago Foundation fo…ForefrontJohn D and Catherine …The Joyce FoundationEfs Foundation
Polk Bros Foundation IncIL97.5× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Field Foundation of Illinois · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Woods Fund of Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Chicago Foundation for Women · Forefront · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Joyce Foundation · Efs Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grand Victoria Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grand Victoria Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    70report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Grand Victoria Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Grand Victoria Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 263 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Grand Victoria’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home