Skip to content
Granadillo Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Granadillo Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$56kCivil Rights$41kPublic Benefit$30kCommunity Improvement$18kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$3kSocial Science$1k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$260k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$4,000
CACNA1A FOUNDATION$3,500
FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAB$3,000
WOODSON CENTER$3,000
CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$2,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$1,500
TURNING POINT USA$1,000
JUDICIAL WATCH INC$500
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $3k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAB: $3k → 10%CACNA1A FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%GRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $2k → 12%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $3k → 11%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAB: $3k → 10%CACNA1A FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $2k → 11%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAB: $3k → 10%CACNA1A FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $2k → 11%JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $1k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAB: $3k → 10%CACNA1A FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $2k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAB: $2k → 10%CACNA1A FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $2k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTAB: $2k → 10%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $2k → 11%WOODSON CENTER: $3k → 14%FLORIDA CITIZENS ALLIANCE INC: $2k → 10%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%WOODSON CENTER: $3k → 14%FLORIDA CITIZENS ALLIANCE INC: $2k → 10%CHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%WOODSON CENTER: $3k → 14%YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%WOODSON CENTER: $3k → 14%WOODSON CENTER: $3k → 14%WOODSON CENTER: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
IN
CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165k · 13 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$165k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+56%

Still filing today

85%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitHealthCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Davidson College
    3× · 2017–2019 · $36k · revenue +42%
  • YA
    Young America's Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +67%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • GC
    GRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +14%
  • TB
    The Becket Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +56%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +189%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for American Progress

The center for american progress (cap) is an independent nonpartisan policy institute that is dedicated to improving the lives of all americans through bold, progressive ideas, as well as strong leadership and concerted action. our aim is…

Civil Rights
2
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
5
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
6
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
7
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Center for Individual Freedom

To investigate, explore and focus public, legislative and judicial attention on all areas of individual freedom and individual rights as guaranteed by the u.s. and state constitutions and free market principles.

Public Benefit
10
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…

—
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for Government Accountability Inc; the most unlike its peers is Butterfly Educational Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Young America's Foundation: $28,000 · OtherYoung America's FoundationCHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherCHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONBUTTERFLY EDUCATIONAL ARTS INC: $3,000 · OtherBUTTERFLY EDUCATIONAL ARTS INCPURDUE FOUNDATION: $2,850 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATION+2 more: $2,000 · OtherDavidson College: $36,000 · EducationDavidson CollegeCOLORADO ACADEMY: $3,000 · EducationCOLORADO ACADEMYGRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $1,500 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC: $16,000 · Public BenefitFOUNDATION FOR G…JUDICIAL WATCH INC: $9,250 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH I…WOODSON CENTER: $18,000 · Community ImprovementWOODSON CEN…CACNA1A Foundation: $15,000 · HealthCACNA1A Fou…Life Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc: $2,450 · HealthLife Choice…ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $12,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE D…FLORIDA CITIZENS ALLIANCE INC: $4,000 · Civil RightsFLORIDA CI…+1 more: $500 · Civil RightsThe Becket Fund: $1,000 · Social ScienceTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$50,850Education$40,500Public Benefit$25,250Community Improvement$18,000Health$17,450Civil Rights$16,500Social Science$1,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDavidson College: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $28,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHERRY CREEK SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCACNA1A Foundation: $15,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $9,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA CITIZENS ALLIANCE INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOLORADO ACADEMY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLife Choice Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc: $2,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRALAND COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Becket Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationVanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Verizon FoundationNJ11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Granadillo Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Granadillo Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Granadillo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home