Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gramian-Emrani Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$360k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$345k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Arts & Culture$1.3MInternational$224kEducation$147kCivil Rights$89kHealth$12kReligion$5kSocial Science$3kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $345k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FARHANG FOUNDATION$345,000
MOMS AGAINST POVERTY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHILD INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 10%EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%IRANIAN AMERICAN WOMEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $345k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $270k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $252k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $98k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $82k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $71k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $27k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%FARHANG FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 6 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
19

Total granted

$1.7M
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+25%

Still filing today

67%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesInternationalHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FARHANG FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +25%
  • MA
    MOMS AGAINST POVERTY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $222k · revenue +257%
  • PE
    PARS EQUALITY CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $84k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • UR
    UC REGENTS
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • IS
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -37%
  • TL
    THE LOS ANGELES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Contemporary Art
2
Encyclopaedia Iranica Foundation Inc
Employment
3
The Khaled Hosseini Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Pardes Foundation
5
Iran Human Rights Documentation Center Inc

The mission of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center is to: Establish a comprehensive and objective historical record of the human rights situation in Iran, and on the basis of this record, establish responsibility for patterns of…

International
6
Coalition for Democracy and Human Rights in Iran
Civil Rights
7
Foundation for Islamic Scholarship and Teaching
Education
8
Iranshahr Orchestra Inc

Iranshahr Orchestra is a non political non-profit organization dedicated to support composers, performers, and educatiors to promote and preserve persian music. The organization will pursue three activities in: education, community…

Arts & Culture
9
Shirzan Foundation

To build bridges that protect and promote civil society, dialogue and discourse that will help cultivate a democratic culture representative of a range of voices, beliefs and perspectives

International
10
Armenian Center for Contemporary Experimental Art Inc

To promote armenian contemporary experimental art

Arts & Culture
11
Iranian American Jewish Cultural Organization

The primary purposes of the organization are to (1) preserve iranian jewish culture and heritage; (2) reach out to the next generation of iranian jews living in the united states; (3) address the changing cultural needs of the iranian…

Arts & Culture
12
Institute for Education Research & Scholarships

Established in 2004, the Institute for Education, Research, and Scholarships (IFERS) is an award-winning California-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit public charity organization dedicated to improving society by conducting scientific and social…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Moms Against Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Amin Arasteh Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FARHANG FOUNDATION — $1,252,022 · Human ServicesFARHANG FOUNDATIONMOMS AGAINST POVERTY — $221,537 · Human ServicesMOMS AGAINST POVERTY+3 more — $2,500 · Human ServicesUC REGENTS SANTA BARBARA — $71,700 · OtherUC REGENT…UC REGENTS — $20,000 · OtherUC REGENT…USC — $20,000 · OtherUSCIAW FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherNIAC — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+7 more — $14,100 · Other+7 morePARS EQUALITY CENTER — $84,000 · Civil RightsUCLA FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationBRENTWOOD SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationKEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · InternationalTwo Chairs Inc — $5,000 · InternationalNECO FOUNDATION — $1,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER — $10,000 · HealthOPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTER — $500 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$1,476,059Other$140,800Civil Rights$84,000Education$25,000International$16,000Health$10,500Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFARHANG FOUNDATION — $1,252,022 over 7y, 14% of budgetMOMS AGAINST POVERTY — $221,537 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetPARS EQUALITY CENTER — $84,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN WITH CANCER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKEEP CHILDREN IN SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTwo Chairs Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAMIN ARASTEH FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUPWARD BOUND HOUSE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNECO FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIranian American Women Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPEN PATHS COUNSELING CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD International — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Maximum Difference Foundation · The Razi Family Foundation · Mozaik Philanthropy Inc · Iranian American Women Foundation · Tahbazof Family Foundation · Wjo Foundation · Declaration of Trust of the Bijan Amin and Soraya Amin Foundation · HAND Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gramian-Emrani Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gramian-Emrani Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gramian-Emrani Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph