Skip to content

· Private foundation

Grace Ford Salvatori Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$178kArts & Culture$146kAnimals$116kPublic Safety & Disaster$92kCrime & Legal$78kHealth$57kHuman Services$39kYouth Development$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$12,915
UCLA JONSSON CANCER CENTER$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$7,321
DOBERMAN PINSCHER RESCUE$5,500
BOYS REPUBLIC OF CHINO FOUNDATION$5,250
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION KERVILLE$3,500
THE 100 CLUBORG$3,110
TUNNELS TO TOWERS$3,000
PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY$2,977
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$2,600
TURNING POINT USA$2,557
SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION$2,500
AUSTIN PET ALIVE$2,382
PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE TEXAS$1,082
CAMP ALONIM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS REPUBLIC OF CHINO FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%Guiding Eyes for the Blind: $515 → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 9%BOYS REPUBLIC OF CHINO FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC OF CHINO FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC OF CHINO FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC OF CHINO FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%BOYS REPUBLIC OF CHINO FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%PATH: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607k · 30 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
34

Total granted

$607k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+35%

Still filing today

43%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +28%
  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +51%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CINEMATHEQUE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +302%

Funded once

  • JC
    JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION UC
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • PU
    POLICE UNITY TOUR CHAPTER VII OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $6k · revenue +65%
  • HF
    Humanitas Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
CJ3 Foundation

Cj3 foundation provides services, support, and advocacy to united states military service members, veterans/disabled veterans, law enforcement, and emergency responders who need/require assistance, and then connecting them with resources…

Human Services
6
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
7
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
8
The National World War Ii Museum Inc

The national wwii museum tells the story of the american experience in the war that changed the world-why it was fought, how it was won, and what it means today-so that all generations will understand the price of freedom and be inspired…

Arts & Culture
9
America's Vetdogs the Veterans K-9 Corps Inc

To assist disabled veterans, active military personnel, first responders with disabilities, and those who have served our country honorably to live with dignity and independence. america's vetdogs trains and places guide dogs for…

Public Benefit
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
12
Institute for Canine Forensics

Our mission is the advancement of education, research and certification of forensic evidence detection dog teams. we promote and elevate professionalism in the use of specially trained canines for historic and prehistoric human remains…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rod Dedeaux Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT HOLLE: $77,611 · OtherLOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT HOLLETHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $37,500 · OtherTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONNATIONAL SEARCH AND RESCUE DOGS: $25,500 · OtherNATIONAL SEARCH AND RESCUE DOGSSAMARITANS PURSE FOUNDATION: $23,500 · OtherSAMARITANS PURSE FOUNDATION+44 more: $150,583 · Other+44 morePEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $71,368 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $67,777 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $19,300 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL T…+2 more: $4,300 · EducationLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $99,515 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHILHARM…AMERICAN CINEMATHEQUE: $42,400 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CINEMATHEQU…DOBERMAN PINSCHER RESCUE: $30,000 · AnimalsAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $11,717 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $9,750 · AnimalsEastwood Ranch Foundation: $4,700 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $3,500 · Animals+1 more: $43 · AnimalsBoys Republic: $25,500 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesPATH: $2,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 · Human Services+2 more: $1,515 · Human ServicesGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $22,222 · PhilanthropyROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Health
Other$314,694Education$162,745Arts & Culture$141,915Animals$59,710Human Services$46,015Philanthropy$26,222Health$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $99,515 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $71,368 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $67,777 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CINEMATHEQUE: $42,400 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDOBERMAN PINSCHER RESCUE: $30,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetBoys Republic: $25,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $22,222 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $19,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $11,717 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $9,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE UNITY TOUR CHAPTER VII OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEastwood Ranch Foundation: $4,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE UNITY TOUR INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,557 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AMUDE HASHALOM: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ONESTAR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREEPEOPLE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderpump Dog Foundation: $43 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CINEMATHEQUE ↗
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOBERMAN PINSCHER RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Boys Republic ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds POLICE UNITY TOUR CHAPTER VII OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Eastwood Ranch Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds ROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds POLICE UNITY TOUR INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Grace Ford Salvatori Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Grace Ford Salvatori Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Grace Ford Salvatori Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Grace Ford Salvatori Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grace Ford Salvatori’s filings →

More from the funding graph