· Private foundation
Gosiger Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $83k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $212k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION | $61,500 |
| OHIO SUICIDE PREVENTION FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| LEARN TO EARN DAYTON | $50,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON | $15,000 |
| GLEN LAKE ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| DAYTON ART INSTITUTE | $12,500 |
| CHAMINADE JULIENNE HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| LEELANAU CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $10,000 |
| THE FOODBANK | $5,000 |
| HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| WAGS INN CANINE CHARITIES | $5,000 |
| THE HOSPICE OF DAYTON | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TDTHE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE4× · 2020–2024 · $318k · revenue +14%
- LTLEARN TO EARN DAYTON3× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +190%
- UOUniversity of Dayton2× · 2020–2024 · $115k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- DPDAYTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $51k
- MHMUNS0N HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $40k
- COCHURCH OF THE HOLY ANGELSone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.
The mission of the coalition is to recruit, expand and retain jobs in the dayton region. the coalition focuses on growing the 14-county dayton region and bolsters job creation and opportunity by supporting entrepreneurial activity,…
To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.
The mission of the dayton society of natural history is to create and provide meaningful and entertaining learning experiences for curious minds to engage with natural history, science, and nature while honoring and preserving collections…
Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.
The mission of the coalition is to recruit, expand and retain jobs in the dayton region. the coalition focuses on growing the 14-county dayton region and bolsters job creation and opportunity by supporting entrepreneurial activity,…
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.
To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.
See schedule othe democracy collaborative was established in 2000 to advance understanding of democracy for the 21st century and to promote emerging strategies and innovations in community development that enhance democratic life. in…
Dayton realtors serves its members as a resource for continuing education, a wide range of committee activities, the multiple listing service, social events, products, and publications.
To reduce cancer incidence and mortality through improved treatment and prevention by offering national, state-of-the-art cancer research to local communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dayton Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wagsinn Canine Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE DAYTON ART INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds LEARN TO EARN DAYTON ↗
- Who funds University of Dayton ↗
- Who funds OHIO SUICIDE PREVENTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LEELANAU CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PRECISION MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WAGSINN CANINE CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds GLEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF DAYTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED CATHOLIC STUDIES ↗
- Who funds Wright State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CONTEMPORARY DANCE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Omega Community Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds MORAINE CADDY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS ↗
- Who funds Greater Dayton Public Television dba Think TV ↗
- Who funds GLEN ARBOR ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds DAYTON HISTORY ↗
- Who funds THE DAYTON FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · Kettering Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · University of Dayton · The CareSource Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Frank M Tait Foundation · The Berry Family Foundation · Miami Valley Hospital
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gosiger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gosiger Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Gosiger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.