Skip to content
Goshen Hill Foundation Inc-Ima at a glance

· Private foundation

Goshen Hill Foundation Inc-Ima

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Animals$405kRecreation & Sports$357kHealth$150kFood & Nutrition$100kHuman Services$100kYouth Development$65kPhilanthropy$50kEducation$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $101k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANNY AND RONS RESCUE$100,000
WARRENTON HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION$25,000
VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
PA NATIONAL HORSE SHOW$10,500
USEA FOUNDATION$10,000
FOOD & FRIENDS$10,000
EQUUS FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ECHOES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%CARIDAD CENTER: $22k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 18 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -17% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$1.2M
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-17%

Still filing today

67%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsHealthAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DR
    DANNY & RONS RESCUE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $350k · revenue +36%
  • US
    UNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $105k · revenue +62%
  • BT
    BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $70k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • RF
    Ryerss Farm for Aged Equinesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +30%
  • GC
    GREAT CHARITY CHALLENGE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • CC
    Caridad Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington International Horse Show

The Washingon International Horse Show is a historic, world class equestrian event that engages,entertains and educates the Washington DC community while supporting charitable and military causes

Recreation & Sports
2
Rosemary Farm Sanctuary Inc

At rosemary farm, our mission is to rescue horses in need and protect them for life. we save equines from slaughter, neglect and abuse. while adoption is not our focus, select horses may be available to the right home, if right for the…

Animals
3
Days End Farm Horse Rescue Inc

To ensure quality care and treatment of horses through intervention, education and outreach.

Animals
4
Humane Equine Aid & Rapid Transport Inc

To provide emergency treatment and transportation to horses at equine events. worked at horse shows and transported injured horses.

Education
5
High Horses Center for Equine- Assisted Services

To improve the well-being of people with special needs through a therapeutic equine experience.

Unclassified
6
Southern California Equine Foundation Inc

Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses

Animals
7
United States Equestrian Federation Inc

The united states equestrian federation's mission is to provide access to and increase participation in equestrian sports at all levels by ensuring fairness, safety, and enjoyment.

Recreation & Sports
8
Equine Rescue and Adoption Foundation Inc

Equine Rescue and Adoption Foundation, Inc. (ERAF) is a non-profit 501(c)3 organization devoted to the rescue, rehabilitation, retraining and adoption of abused, slaughter-bound, abandoned and neglected horses.

Animals
9
Gateway Horseworks

Gateway horseworks incorporates horses for the mental health treatment of people

Health
10
Special Equestrians Inc

Our Vision: A community where the impossible becomes possible. Our mission: To enrich the lives of people with physical, cognitive or emotional challenges through a relationship with a horse.

Human Services
11
Equicenter Inc

Equicenter fosters growth, wellness, and educational opportunities for people of all ages and abilities through the power of horses, horticulture, and nature-based experiences.

Health
12
Exceptional Equestrians Company

Improving lives through the healing power of horses.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Therapeutic Horseback Riding Inc; the most unlike its peers is United States Equestrian Team Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW BOLTON CENTER CAMPAIGN: $100,000 · OtherNEW BOLTON CENTER CAMPAIGNBLOWING ROCK CHARITY HORSE SHOW: $75,000 · OtherBLOWING ROCK CHARITY HORSE SHOWIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWORK TO RIDE INC: $65,000 · OtherWORK TO RIDE INCTHORNCROFT: $45,000 · OtherTHORNCROFTTHERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INC: $40,000 · OtherTHERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INCPA NATIONAL HORSE SHOW: $31,500 · OtherRyerss Farm for Aged Equines: $30,000 · OtherDEVON HORSE SHOW AND COUNTRY: $25,000 · OtherGREAT CHARITY CHALLENGE: $25,000 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $25,000 · Other+7 more: $75,000 · Other+7 moreDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $350,118 · AnimalsDANNY & RONS RESCUECaring Hearts for Canines: $15,000 · Animals+1 more: $10,000 · AnimalsUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES EQUE…BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $70,000 · Recreation & SportsBUFFALO THERAPEUTI…WARRENTON HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsWARRENTON HORSE SH…VIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsVIRGINIA HORSE CEN…GPL POLO CLUB INC: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGPL POLO CLUB INCCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $35,000 · HealthFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $35,000 · HealthVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $12,500 · HealthMIDDLEBURG CLASSIC HORSE SHOW INC: $5,000 · HealthCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $65,000 · Food & NutritionTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL: $30,400 · EducationECHOES AROUND THE WORLD: $17,500 · EducationCaridad Center Inc: $22,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$601,500Animals$375,118Recreation & Sports$240,000Health$87,500Food & Nutrition$65,000Education$47,900Human Services$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $350,118 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetUNITED STATES EQUESTRIAN TEAM FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $70,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK: $65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWORK TO RIDE INC: $65,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INC: $40,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AGNES IRWIN SCHOOL: $30,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRyerss Farm for Aged Equines: $30,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWARRENTON HORSE SHOW FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetVIRGINIA HORSE CENTER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCaridad Center Inc: $22,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetECHOES AROUND THE WORLD: $17,500 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetCaring Hearts for Canines: $15,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetHome of the Sparrow Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGPL POLO CLUB INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUSEA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWillistown Conservation Trust Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEQUUS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hamilton Family Found…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Moran Family Charitab…E Murdoch Family Foun…Dun FoundationThe Goldman Sachs Cha…Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Renaissance Charitabl…The Bank of America C…
Hamilton Family FoundationPA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hamilton Family Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Moran Family Charitable Fdn-Ima · E Murdoch Family Foundation · Dun Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goshen Hill Foundation Inc-Ima funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goshen Hill Foundation Inc-Ima. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Caridad Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goshen Hill Foundation Inc-Ima’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home