· Private foundation
Moran Family Charitable Fdn-Ima
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $71k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DELAWARE VALLEY FRIENDS SCHOOL | $26,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| WESTTOWN SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CONCORD CARLISLE COMMUNITY CHEST | $10,000 |
| UMBRELLA ART CENTER | $10,000 |
| HOUSEHOLD GOODS | $7,500 |
| FRIENDS OF CONCORD CARLILSE PLAYING | $5,648 |
| OPEN TABLE | $5,000 |
| GAINING GROUND | $5,000 |
| ASHLEY ADDICTION TREATMENT | $5,000 |
| CONCORD LAND CONSERVATION TRUST | $2,500 |
| MAIN LINE ANIMAL RESCUE | $2,500 |
| THE NATURE CONNECTION | $2,500 |
| PICO SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| MIGHTY MOOSE FOUNDATION INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMALOTO INC4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +27%
- RHRADNOR HUNT FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +11% · 53% of their budget
- DBDream Big Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +102%
Funded once
- DIDIGNITY IN ASYLUM INCone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -28%
- NBNASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INCone grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +24%
THE NATURE CONNECTION INCone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.
We seek to end animal agriculture by rescuing farmed animals, giving them lifelong care and sanctuary, and educating about the harms of animal farming.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.
THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…
Danbury animal welfare society , inc.(daws) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the lives of animals in our community and beyond. we promote responsible pet guardianship and the humane treatment of animals, and work toward…
To rescue horses who are abused, neglected, or at-risk of slaughter.
The mission of the mspca is to protect animals, relieve their suffering, advance their health and welfare, prevent cruelty and work for a just and compassionate society.
To rescue and provide medical treatment for abused and abandoned animals; to rehabilitate rescued animals and find permanent placement in loving adoptive homes; to provide loving lifelong care at our sanctuary for those animals who are not…
To encourage and motivate the making of gifts and donations by deed, will, or otherwise, for the advancement, promotion, extension, and maintenance of the various causes and objectives fostered by the humane pennsylvania.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Therapeutic Horseback Riding Inc and the most unlike its peers is Historic Sugartown Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MALOTO INC ↗
- Who funds RADNOR HUNT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Dream Big Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSEHOLD GOODS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds DIGNITY IN ASYLUM INC ↗
- Who funds NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Caring Hearts for Canines ↗
- Who funds CONCORD LAND CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds Willistown Conservation Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds KILLINGTON PICO AREA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds GAINING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR ↗
- Who funds Main Line Animal Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA URBAN RIDING ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chester County Community Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · E Murdoch Family Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Quaker City Foundation · Concord Carlisle Foundation Inc · Kane Wallace Foundation · Hamilton Family Foundation · Middlesex Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Goshen Hill Foundation Inc-Ima · The Amelia Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Moran Family Charitable Fdn-Ima funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Open Table Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Nature Connection Inc — 5% of income from government
- Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Moran Family Charitable Fdn-Ima?
Find your warmest path to Moran Family Charitable Fdn-Ima through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.