Skip to content
Goldstine Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Goldstine Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$349k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$226kHealth$190kEducation$173kReligion$144kArts & Culture$120kCommunity Improvement$70kCivil Rights$65kHousing & Shelter$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $329k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISRAEL POLICY FORUM$36,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$25,000
CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIE$25,000
PUBLIC COUNSEL$25,000
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA$25,000
EXECUTIVE SERVICE CORP OF SOUTHERN$25,000
SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER$25,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$25,000
THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NOR$18,000
BEIT T'SHUVAH$15,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
T'RUAH$10,000
THE PEOPLE CONCERN$10,000
BEND THE ARC A JEWISH PRTSHP FOR JU$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $15k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $15k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $10k → 14%URBAN VOICES PROJECT: $5k → 14%URBAN VOICES PROJECT: $5k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $5k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $5k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 18 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
8

Total granted

$775k
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
-26%

Still filing today

78%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    ISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $121k · revenue +73%
  • CS
    CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +9%
  • VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • I
    IKAR
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • ST
    SINAI TEMPLE
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • JS
    J STREET
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
3
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
4
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
One for Israel

One for israel's purposes are to unite u.s. and international churches, ministries and individuals for the proclamation of the gospel in israel, to raise funds for evangelism and gospel proclamation, to provide tangible relief for israel's…

—
7
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
8
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington

As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…

Community Improvement
9
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
10
Israeli-American Council

The organization's mission is to build an engaged and united israeli-american community that strengthens the israeli and jewish identity of our next generation, the american-jewish community and the bond between the peoples of the united…

Human Services
11
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
12
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Council for Public Affairs Inc; the most unlike its peers is The People Concern. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IKAR: $75,000 · OtherIKAREXECUTIVE SERVICE CORP OF SOUTHERN: $70,000 · OtherEXECUTIVE SERVICE CORP OF SOUTHERNBeit T'Shuvah: $55,000 · OtherBeit T'ShuvahTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NOR: $36,000 · OtherTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $30,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODBEND THE ARC A JEWISH PRTSHP FOR JU: $30,000 · OtherBEND THE ARC A JEWISH PRTSHP FOR JUSINAI TEMPLE: $22,755 · OtherSINAI TEMPLENATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $30,000 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPO…+5 more: $30,000 · Other+5 moreISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC: $121,000 · InternationalISRAEL POLICY FORUM INCNEW ISRAEL FUND: $70,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDT'RUAH: $30,000 · InternationalT'RUAHHIAS INC: $20,000 · InternationalHIAS INCJ STREET: $10,000 · InternationalCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $80,000 · EducationCROSSROADS SCHOOL …UCLA FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $17,500 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UN…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $50,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CU…HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $50,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST M…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF …THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $40,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesURBAN VOICES PROJECT: $10,000 · Human ServicesVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $60,000 · HealthPUBLIC COUNSEL: $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$378,755International$251,000Education$177,500Arts & Culture$110,000Human Services$65,000Health$60,000Crime & Legal$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetISRAEL POLICY FORUM INC: $121,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetT'RUAH: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHIAS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJ STREET: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN VOICES PROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHABONIM CAMP KVUTZA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH WORLD WATCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Goldstine Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Goldstine Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goldstine Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home