· Private foundation
Goldsmith Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $20,000 |
| SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC | $17,250 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY | $11,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS SOUTH FLORIDA REGION | $10,000 |
| INFORMED FAMILIES | $8,000 |
| THE WAY FORWARD FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR NEW EDUCATION INITIATIVES | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI WINTER WONDERFUL | $3,750 |
| NEVA KING COOPER PRINCIPAL'S FUND | $3,000 |
| RCMA EVERGLADES II CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $1,000 |
| TWO HUNDRED CLUB OF GREATER MIAMI | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Miami8× · 2017–2025 · $149k · revenue +96%
SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC3× · 2022–2025 · $47k · revenue +140%- DHDADE HERITAGE TRUST INC4× · 2017–2022 · $45k · revenue +281%
Funded once
- RMRonald McDonald House Globalgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +27%
- FTFOR THE LOVE OF LEARNINGone grant, 2017 · $6k
- RDROTARY DISTRICT 6990 FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +131% · 34% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
To serve as a catalyst for the establishment of miami as the technology hub for the americas in order to propel innovation and investment in south florida and latin america.
The fiu research foundation provides means by which discoveries, inventions, processes, and work products of faculty, staff and students of the university may be patented, developed, applied and utilized in order that the results of such…
To create a greater miami where everyone can thrive by accelerating generosity, leadership, and community engagement. the miami foundation serves as a philanthropic and community backbone for greater miami, bringing together donors,…
To provide students with a comprehensive international education through the use of technology and language acquisition, so that students will become life-long inquisitive learners and utilize this knowledge across international boundaries.
University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…
The miami association of realtors (miami) was chartered by the national association of realtors in 1920 and is celebrating 105 years of service to realtors, the buying and selling public, and the communities in south florida. comprised of…
Support of miami university
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chapman Partnership Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rotary District 6990 Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR NEW EDUCATION INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds INFORMED FAMILIESTHE FLORIDA FAMILY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC ↗
- Who funds DADE HERITAGE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds The Woody Foundation Inc dba The Way Forward Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds MIAMI LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED INC ↗
- Who funds ZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAST Academy PTSA ↗
- Who funds MIAMI BAYSIDE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
- Who funds KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROTARY DISTRICT 6990 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARMED FORCES SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS 4 YOU RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
- Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
- Who funds PELICAN HARBOR SEABIRD STATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD FOUNDATION FOR GIRL GUIDES AND GIRL SCOUTS INC ↗
- Who funds MARIAN CENTER SCHOOL AND SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Tonkinson Foundation Inc · Anthony Abraham Foundation · The Kirk Foundation · The Garner Foundation · Peacock Foundation Inc · Assurant Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Goldsmith Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Miami Bayside Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
- Miami Lighthouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired Inc — 0% of income from government
- Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
- Zoo Miami Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.