· Private foundation
Goff Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k87 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
- $250k+1 grant · $325k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA NETWORK | $325,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
| LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION | $18,160 |
| ONE HUMDRED ANGELS | $15,800 |
| FRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA | $7,000 |
| SOUNDS ACADEMY | $4,700 |
| UNITARIAN UNIV CONGREG OF PHX (UUCP) | $4,500 |
| HUMANIST SOCIETY OF GREATER PHOENIX | $3,500 |
| UNION FOR CONCERNED SCIENTISTS | $3,000 |
| CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES | $3,000 |
| TONTO GRAVITY RIDERS | $3,000 |
| UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS | $2,500 |
| ST MARY'S FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $1,800 |
| CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98 repeat relationships — 85 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA NETWORK4× · 2021–2024 · $930k · revenue +305% · 68% of their budget
University of Arizona Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $170k · revenue +12%- FOFRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA4× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- UOU OF A LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · $37k
NETWORK FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION INCone grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -62%- AHARIZONA HOUSING COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $400 · revenue +291%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
The american civil liberties union of arizona is the state's premier guardian of liberty working through the arizona legislature and communities statewide to defend and preserve individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the…
To assist member firms in achieving higher professional, ethical business and economic standards, enabling member firms to provide quality consulting and engineering services for their clients and the public.
We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Greater phoenix chamber of commerce (the chamber) catalyzes regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy, intentional economic growth, and diverse, prepared talent.
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mcdowell Sonoran Conservancy and the most unlike its peers is Expect More Arizona. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAVE OUR SCHOOLS ARIZONA NETWORK ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PUBLIC RADIO ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds ONE HUNDRED ANGELS ↗
- Who funds HUMANIST SOCIETY OF GREATER PHOENIX INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ARIZONA SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SOUNDS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UMOM NEW DAY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS ACTION ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CREIGHTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds POPULATION CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MCDOWELL SONORAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS ↗
- Who funds Valley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association ↗
- Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · John F Long Foundation Inc · Ellis Center for Educational Excellence · Valley of the Sun United Way · American Express Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Steele Foundation Inc · Helios Education Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Libra Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Goff Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Goff Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Goff Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.