· Private foundation
Glore Fund
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k55 grants · $115k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $185k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TASIS FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| LACROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $35,000 |
| PIERRE MONTEUX MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING | $25,000 |
| RUSH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FOR HEALTH | $20,000 |
| PINGREE SCHOOL | $19,000 |
| WARREN MILLER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER | $18,000 |
| GATEWAY MILBRIDGE | $17,500 |
| ALL SAINTS IN BIG SKY | $15,000 |
| WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC | $10,000 |
| THE NORTH PARISH OF NORTH ANDOVER | $9,500 |
| BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION | $8,000 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $8,000 |
| NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW | $5,000 |
| IPSWICH RIVER WATER SHED ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
85 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EHEskenazi Health Foundation Inc2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +81%
- FOFRIENDS OF BIG SKY EDUCATION5× · 2020–2024 · $86k · revenue +15%
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY5× · 2020–2024 · $81k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- EHESKENAZI HEALTH FOUNDATION PLEDGEone grant, 2020 · $25k
- WHWOMEN'S HEALTH RESOUCES LIBRARYone grant, 2020 · $25k
- BSBIG SKY ARTS COUNCILone grant, 2020 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orchard School Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lifeline Pet Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GATEWAY MILBRIDGE ↗
- Who funds Eskenazi Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG SKY EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds THE PINGREE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING ↗
- Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY ↗
- Who funds TASIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PIERRE MONTEUX MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds IPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BIG SKY SKATING & HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC ↗
- Who funds ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Moonlight Community Foundation · Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Spanish Peaks Community Foundation · The Carter Family Foundation · One Valley Community Foundation · Knight Foundation CO M Scholz · Michael D Arneson and Susan H Arneson · Harold W Sweatt Foundation · Nathaniel & Elizabeth P Stevens Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glore Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ipswich River Watershed Association — 68% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Marine Biological Laboratory — 20% of income from government
- Essex County Greenbelt Association — 8% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Denison Society Inc — 6% of income from government
- Children's Beach House Inc — 5% of income from government
- Essex Art Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Merrimack Repertory Theatre Inc — 2% of income from government
- Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Denison Pequotsepos Nature Center — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.