Skip to content
Glore Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

Glore Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$433k
Granted FY2025still arriving
70
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$372kHealth$321kEducation$281kFood & Nutrition$207kReligion$146kEnvironment$135kHuman Services$111kCommunity Improvement$104kOther$0
02FY2025 · 70 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k57 grants · $122k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $105k
$2,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY$55,000
TASIS FOUNDATION INC$50,000
LACROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$30,000
PIERRE MONTEUX MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$25,000
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC$25,000
WARREN MILLER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$25,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$20,000
PINGREE SCHOOL$19,000
WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING$15,000
THE NORTH PARISH OF NORTH ANDOVER$14,000
WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC$12,500
RUSH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FOR HEALTH$11,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$10,000
BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$8,000
SIERRA CLUB$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 22% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $25k → 10%HOLDEN VILLAGE: $500 → 9%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%HOLDEN VILLAGE: $500 → 9%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $8k → 10%HOLDEN VILLAGE: $500 → 9%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 8%BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%HOLDEN VILLAGE: $500 → 9%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500 → 14%WINDRUSH FARM: $15k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $15k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM: $15k → 10%HESSED HOUSE INC: $1k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 8%PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER DBA HESED HOUSE: $1k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 8%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $13k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $10k → 10%WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $10k → 10%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 8%BATAVIA RSVP INC: $500 → 8%BATAVIA RSVP INC: $500 → 8%BATAVIA RSVP INC: $500 → 8%BATAVIA RSVP INC: $500 → 8%BATAVIA RSVP INC: $500 → 8%BATAVIA RSVP INC: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 92 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

92 repeat relationships: 61 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
29

Total granted

$2.1M
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+16%

Still filing today

66%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BIG SKY EDUCATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $112k · revenue +15%
  • AC
    ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +297%
  • TF
    TASIS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • WH
    WOMEN'S HEALTH RESOUCES LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • EH
    ESKENAZI HEALTH FOUNDATION PLEDGE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • BS
    BIG SKY ARTS COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
3
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
8
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
9
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
10
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Midcoast Conservancy

The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Food Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lifeline Pet Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
81/81
Grantees still filing
52/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY: $110,000 · OtherARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKYLA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $100,000 · OtherLA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYALL SAINTS IN BIG SKY: $75,000 · OtherALL SAINTS IN BIG SKYRUSH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM FOR HEALTH: $58,000 · OtherMONTEUX SCHOOL AND MUSIC FESTIVAL: $54,500 · OtherTHE NORTH PARISH OF NORTH ANDOVER: $44,000 · OtherTASIS FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 · OtherTASIS FOUNDATION INCGATEWAY MILBRIDGE: $105,000 · OtherGATEWAY MILBRIDGEPIERRE MONTEUX MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherPIERRE MONTEUX MEMORIAL FOUNDATION+70 more: $534,100 · Other+70 moreEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $100,000 · HealthEskenazi H…WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING: $83,500 · HealthWOMEN FOR …Rush University Medical Center: $21,000 · HealthRush Unive…BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $15,000 · HealthBETH ISRAE…+2 more: $1,250 · HealthFRIENDS OF BIG SKY EDUCATION: $112,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS O…LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · PhilanthropyLA CROSSE…Maine Community Foundation Inc: $20,500 · PhilanthropyMaine Com…ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $101,000 · Food & NutritionGREATER C…FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $62,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK…SECOND HELPINGS INC: $15,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HE…+4 more: $16,500 · Food & Nutrition+4 moreTHE PINGREE SCHOOL INC: $98,750 · EducationTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $30,000 · EducationWHEATON COLLEGE: $11,000 · EducationLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $7,500 · EducationDERBY ACADEMY TRUSTEES: $7,000 · EducationBIG SKY DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC dba BIG SKY DISCOVERY ACADEMY: $6,500 · Education+7 more: $27,350 · EducationBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $38,000 · EnvironmentIPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $23,500 · EnvironmentESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $12,500 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EnvironmentGallatin River Task Force: $10,000 · EnvironmentNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc: $8,500 · EnvironmentCENTER FOR AMAZON COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: $8,500 · EnvironmentMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC: $7,500 · EnvironmentDENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER: $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $6,000 · Environment+2 more: $5,000 · EnvironmentWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $77,500 · Human ServicesBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $32,500 · Human ServicesHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesGorton Community Center: $9,000 · Human Services+4 more: $8,500 · Human Services
Other$1,260,600Health$220,750Philanthropy$202,500Food & Nutrition$195,000Education$188,100Environment$169,000Human Services$152,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF BIG SKY EDUCATION: $112,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY: $110,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetGATEWAY MILBRIDGE: $105,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetTASIS FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $101,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $100,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetEskenazi Health Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PINGREE SCHOOL INC: $98,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING: $83,500 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetWINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC: $77,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetPIERRE MONTEUX MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $62,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $38,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $23,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Community Foundation Inc: $20,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBIG SKY SKATING & HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $14,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGallatin River Task Force: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGorton Community Center: $9,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFalls Church Elementary PTA: $9,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc: $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR AMAZON COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: $8,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDERBY ACADEMY TRUSTEES: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBIG SKY DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC dba BIG SKY DISCOVERY ACADEMY: $6,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNorth Bennet Street School: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIG SKY EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF BIG SKY ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY MILBRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds TASIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds LA CROSSE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Eskenazi Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE PINGREE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN FOR HEALTHY RURAL LIVING ↗
  • Who funds WINDRUSH FARM THERAPEUTIC EQUITATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PIERRE MONTEUX MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds LA CROSSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds BEAU BIDEN FOUNDATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC ↗
  • Who funds IPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Maine Community Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY SKATING & HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ECKER CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Essex County Communit…Boston Foundation IncMoonlight Community F…Yellowstone Club Comm…Eastern Bank Foundati…Spanish Peaks Communi…The Carter Family Fou…One Valley Community …Knight Foundation CO …Michael D Arneson and…Harold W Sweatt Found…Nathaniel & Elizabeth…
Essex County Community Foundation IncMA20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Moonlight Community Foundation · Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Spanish Peaks Community Foundation · The Carter Family Foundation · One Valley Community Foundation · Knight Foundation CO M Scholz · Michael D Arneson and Susan H Arneson · Harold W Sweatt Foundation · Nathaniel & Elizabeth P Stevens Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glore Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glore Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Ipswich River Watershed Association: 68% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Marine Biological Laboratory: 20% of income from government
  • Essex County Greenbelt Association: 8% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Denison Society Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Children's Beach House Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Essex Art Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Merrimack Repertory Theatre Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Denison Pequotsepos Nature Center: 0% of income from government
  • Wheaton College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glore’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home