Skip to content

· Private foundation

Global GLOW

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$136k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Youth Development$9.7MInternational$274kEducation$129kArts & Culture$100kHousing & Shelter$59kCommunity Improvement$2kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $694k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $787k
$18,050
Median grant
10
States reached
$916k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Child Welfare Society$136,198
Newi$129,787
Ceinode$88,145
Hafai$81,095
Ready for Reading$73,444
Individual grant recipient$62,079
Individual grant recipient$58,894
Fead- Ghana Formerly the League$54,502
World Economy Skills Agro Dev$51,840
Nice$50,957
Art of a Child$38,750
Shohratgarh Environmental Society$38,110
Rift Valley Reading Association$36,500
Individual grant recipient$33,867
Superkids Foundation$32,151
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 21% of grant dollars ($2.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 79% that went abroad ($8.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $143k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WORKING GROUP ON GIRLS: $850 → 17%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $21k → 23%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS: $14k → 9%KENYA EDUCATION FUND: $3k → 17%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $17k → 23%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS: $11k → 9%KENYA EDUCATION FUND: $1k → 17%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $12k → 23%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS: $7k → 9%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $9k → 23%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS: $6k → 9%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS: $6k → 9%Friends of Thai Daughters: $5k → 9%SEEDS OF HOPE: $21k → 14%SEEDS OF HOPE: $4k → 14%SEEDS OF HOPE: $2k → 14%SEEDS OF HOPE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
PA
CA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
MS
FL

Beyond the US: 79% of all-years giving ($8.0M)

30 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Kenya$1.3M · 12 grants
Ghana$1.1M · 12 grants
Nigeria$974k · 15 grants
Sierra Leone$953k · 6 grants
Haiti$729k · 6 grants
India$578k · 17 grants
Rwanda$513k · 6 grants
Uganda$478k · 18 grants
Cameroon$350k · 6 grants
United Kingdom$205k · 9 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.4M · 84 repeat orgs$792k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

84 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
39

Total granted

$9.4M
$625k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+15%

Still filing today

14%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $167k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES
    4× · 2019–2022 · $59k · revenue +195%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $49k · revenue +30%
  • SO
    SEEDS OF HOPE INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +374%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $126k
  • FG
    FEAD - GHANA (FRMLY THE LEAGUE)
    one grant, 2023 · $105k
  • LI
    LITWORLD INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Educate Girls

Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…

International
2
Global Glow
Youth Development
3
Karuna Usa Inc

Access to opportunities for marginalized people in S Asia

International
4
Ceda International

To strengthen young women's civic participation and leadership

—
5
Unatti Foundation

Unatti foundation is a non profit organization the provides comprehensive programs for girls in nepal who live in vulnerable situations. through academic health and life skills education nepali girls become englished enpowered leaders who…

International
6
Girls Education Collaborative Inc

GEC partners with locally-led organizations to catalyze and support sustainable, community-driven solutions that remove social, economic, and gender-based barriers keeping girls out of school in under-resourced regions of the global south.

International
7
U-Touch Inc

Sch O

International
8
Educating Kids in Ghana

Educating kids in ghana

Education
9
Girls Education International

Education for underserved women and girls in remote regions of developing countries

International
10
Global Educ Campaign

Dosti sets up and manages schools in asian countries

Philanthropy
11
Open Inc

Education of underprivileged children in India

Education
12
Kidogo Early Years Inc

Kidogo's objective is to improve access to highquality, affordable Early Childhood Care & Education in East Africa's low-income communities and ensure young children are getting the best start to life during their most formative years…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Think Together; the most unlike its peers is Girls Mentors Girls Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEWI: $995,425 · OtherNEWICHILD WELFARE SOCIETY: $952,867 · OtherCHILD WELFARE SOCIETYCEINODE: $654,861 · OtherCEINODETOYA: $542,713 · OtherTOYAHAFAI: $529,654 · OtherHAFAIREADY FOR READING: $512,643 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $410,099 · OtherART OF A CHILD: $350,386 · Other+110 more: $4,738,720 · Other+110 moreRUKMINI FOUNDATION: $123,161 · InternationalLITWORLD INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 · InternationalAYENDA FOUNDATION: $23,415 · International+1 more: $1,456 · InternationalSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $58,941 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC: $49,243 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $29,555 · Human Services+2 more: $4,830 · Human ServicesSUPERKIDS FOUNDATION: $51,990 · EducationTHE LEO PROJECT INC: $37,488 · EducationTIYYA FOUNDATION INC: $4,973 · EducationTHINK TOGETHER: $4,005 · EducationNOVA ACADEMY: $3,707 · Education+1 more: $1,350 · EducationGIRLS MENTORS GIRLS INC: $8,090 · Youth DevelopmentBATA FOUNDATION: $4,440 · Community ImprovementProject Access Inc: $2,355 · Community Improvement
Other$9,687,368International$248,032Human Services$142,569Education$103,513Youth Development$8,090Community Improvement$6,795

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUKMINI FOUNDATION: $123,161 over 6y, 41% of budgetLITWORLD INTERNATIONAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $58,941 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSUPERKIDS FOUNDATION: $51,990 over 3y, 65% of budgetFRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC: $49,243 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetTHE LEO PROJECT INC: $37,488 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $29,555 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetAYENDA FOUNDATION: $23,415 over 3y, 16% of budgetTIYYA FOUNDATION INC: $4,973 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBATA FOUNDATION: $4,440 over 1y, 18% of budgetTHINK TOGETHER: $4,005 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENYA EDUCATION FUND: $3,980 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNOVA ACADEMY: $3,707 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetProject Access Inc: $2,355 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUn Mundo: $1,456 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCREER COMMUNIDAD Y FAMILIA: $1,350 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUKMINI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITWORLD INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds SUPERKIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Global GLOW funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Global GLOW. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Global GLOW?

    Find your warmest path to Global GLOW through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 136 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Global GLOW’s filings →

    More from the funding graph