Skip to content
Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
173
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Science & Tech$5.3MEducation$4.9MHealth$4.7MEnvironment$4.6MInternational$1.3MArts & Culture$1.1MYouth Development$1.1MAnimals$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 173 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k124 grants · $2.8M
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+10 grants · $4.6M
$25,000
Median grant
27
States reached
$221M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$750,000
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$750,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION SCRIPPS RESEARCH$500,000
FINCA INTERNATIONAL$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION SCRIPPS RESEARCH$500,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$434,000
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITYFOUNDATION$320,000
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITYFOUNDATION$320,000
MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATICCANCER FOUNDATION$250,000
BIOBUS$250,000
CENTER FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION$200,000
PATH TO COLLEGE$200,000
NORWALK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$200,000
BARNARD COLLEGE$150,000
STEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT-MAMARONECK$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TREASURE COAST GIRLS COALITION: $13k → 12%FLORIDA KEYS CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $25k → 13%FLORIDA KEYS CHILDREN SHELTER: $15k → 13%LATINAS LEADING TOMORROW: $11k → 7%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $750k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $600k → 6%FLORIDA KEYS CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $15k → 13%HALL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $25k → 9%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $400k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATICCANCER FOUNDATION: $250k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $250k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $200k → 6%ENFAMILIA: $20k → 15%GIRLS WHO CODE: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 40 repeat orgs$9.9M to everyone else

40 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 129 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
69

Total granted

$15M
$5.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+17%

Still filing today

88%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +17%
  • ML
    MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +22%
  • FI
    FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • NC
    NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2022 · $1.1M
  • BW
    Busch Wildlife Sanctuary Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -89% · 92% of their budget
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $750k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Harmony Dc Public Charter Schools

The mission of the charter school is to prepare students for higher learning in a safe, caring, and collaborative atmosphere through a quality learner-centered educational program with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering,…

Education
3
Society for Science & the Public

Society for science is a champion for science, dedicated to expanding scientific literacy, effective stem education and scientific research.

Science & Tech
4
Delaware Foundation for Science and Mathematics Education

Dfsme's mission is to strengthen science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education to prepare all delaware students to be informed citizens and competitive in the global workforce.

Science & Tech
5
Futures Ignite Inc

We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.

Human Services
6
Girls in Stem
Human Services
7
National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Inc

To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful african american, native american and latinx women and men in engineering and technology, math, and science-based careers.

Civil Rights
8
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
9
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
The Citizen Science Lab

Creating science pipelines for diverse and marginalized communities through life changing hands-on stem experiences.

Human Services
12
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foundation for Lee County Public Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dr Genie's Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

188 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 188 of the 238 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
185/188
Grantees still filing
100/188
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $3,500,000 · OtherNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION SCRIPPS RESEARCH: $3,500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION SCRIPPS RESEARCHNICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEM: $1,149,000 · OtherNICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTH SYSTEMFROST MUSEUM OF SCIENCE PHILIP AND PATRICIA: $475,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE PALM BEACHES: $450,000 · OtherLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $500,000 · Other+103 more: $3,923,500 · Other+103 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $750,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY O…FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $640,000 · EducationFLORIDA ATLANTIC…WEBB INSTITUTE: $225,000 · EducationWEBB INSTITUTEPATH TO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationPATH TO COLLEGE …BARNARD COLLEGE: $190,000 · Education+46 more: $1,664,700 · Education+46 moreMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,450,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGAR…+7 more: $188,500 · Human Services+7 moreSHELL MUSEUM AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 · Arts & CultureORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION: $200,000 · Arts & CultureSCHOOLYARD FILMS INC: $145,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE: $100,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more: $285,000 · Arts & CultureFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $100,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of the Palm Beaches & Treasure Coast Inc: $100,000 · International+3 more: $95,000 · InternationalAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $434,000 · HealthBIOBUS INC: $400,000 · HealthNorwalk Hospital Foundation: $200,000 · HealthARTHUR ASHE INSTITUTE FOR URBAN HEALTH INC: $100,000 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $50,000 · Health+2 more: $45,000 · HealthBusch Wildlife Sanctuary Foundation Inc: $1,000,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF MANATEE LAGOON INC: $80,000 · Animals
Other$13,497,500Education$3,669,700Human Services$2,638,500Arts & Culture$1,480,000International$1,295,000Health$1,229,000Animals$1,080,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $3,500,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,450,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetBusch Wildlife Sanctuary Foundation Inc: $1,000,000 over 1y, 92% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $750,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $640,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $500,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetSHELL MUSEUM AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $500,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $434,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIOBUS INC: $400,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetORLANDO SCIENCE CENTERINC: $250,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWEBB INSTITUTE: $225,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSCORE Foundation: $200,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetCENTER FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION: $200,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetPATH TO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetNorwalk Hospital Foundation: $200,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $190,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEM ALLIANCE OF LARCHMONT- MAMARONECK INC: $150,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetSCHOOLYARD FILMS INC: $145,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetNORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUrban Arts Partnership: $120,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $101,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE: $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetARTHUR ASHE INSTITUTE FOR URBAN HEALTH INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of the Palm Beaches & Treasure Coast Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetLiteracy Partners Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF MANATEE LAGOON INC: $80,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS INC: $60,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetEckerd College: $59,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $58,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALUSA WATERKEEPER INC: $55,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetTHE ART OF PROBLEM SOLVING INITIATIVE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MEDALS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBROOKLYN NAVY YARD DEVELOPMENT CORP: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEM TEACHERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetUniversity of Houston Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBUFFALO STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW YORK EDGE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Td Charitable Foundat…The Batchelor Foundat…Cornelia T Bailey Cha…The Frederick a Deluc…Pinkerton FoundationPwc Foundation IncThe Hyde and Watson F…Cornelia T Bailey Cha…The Jim Moran Foundat…Publix Super Markets …Community Foundation …Blue Cross Blue Shiel…
Td Charitable FoundationME32.2× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Td Charitable Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Cornelia T Bailey Charitable Trust · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Community Foundation of Broward Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 320%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Dream in Green Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Hall Neighborhood House Inc: 27% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford: 20% of income from government
  • Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Florida Keys Childrens Shelter Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Youth Environmental Alliance Inc: 18% of income from government
  • The Discovery Museum Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Goodwin University Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Liberty Science Center: 14% of income from government
  • Delaware Children's Museum Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Archbold Expeditions Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Alachua Conservation Trust Inc: 5% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Person to Person Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Orlando Science Centerinc: 4% of income from government
  • Museum of Discovery and Science Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Center for Creative Education: 2% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Bristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Sea Turtle Conservancy: 1% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University: 0% of income from government
  • Eckerd College: 0% of income from government
  • Florida Oceanographic Society Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
32get no government money at all
52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Glenn W Bailey Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 238 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glenn W Bailey’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home