Skip to content
Glasmann Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Glasmann Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$112kEducation$103kFood & Nutrition$53kHuman Services$34kArts & Culture$15kHousing & Shelter$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kInternational$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$727k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
MARINER'S BETHEL UMC MISSION TEAM$5,000
SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC$4,700
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$3,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$3,000
SAM DAY FOUNDATION$3,000
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES$3,000
ELIZABETH STEWART TREEHOUSE MUSEUM$3,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$3,000
KEARNS HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
LANTERN HOUSE$2,000
DISABILITY LAW CENTER (DLC) UTAH$2,000
UTAH FFA FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UTAH FFA FOUNDATION: $2k → 12%UTAH FFA FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%UTAH FFA FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$321k · 21 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
14

Total granted

$321k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+30%

Still filing today

52%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SAM DAY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +280%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +53%
  • HC
    HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2023 · $19k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • LP
    LDS PHILANTHROPIES
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • LB
    LORD BALTIMORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue ×15
  • PS
    PHILLIP SHOWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
2
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
3
One Utah Health Collaborative

The organization's purpose is focused on improving and advancing health care in utah to be more affordable, with better health outcomes by accelerating, enabling and promoting healthcare innovation.

Health
4
University Hospital Foundation

Fundraising for healthcare to support patient care, medical education, and clinical research for University of Utah Hospitals & Clinics and other similar nonprofit organizations.

Philanthropy
5
Utah Medical Association

The Utah Medical Association is a professional resource for member physicians providing educational opportunities and dissemination of medical knowledge and practices.

—
6
Utah World Trade Center

World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.

Community Improvement
7
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
8
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
9
Utah Taxpayers Association

The Utah Taxpayer's Association was founded as a nonprofit, nonpartisan voluntary organization of approxiamately 2,800 businesses, professionals and individuals who work together for more efficient and effective government. The…

Civil Rights
10
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
11
Utah Geological Foundation
—
12
Wasatch Homeless Health Care

Help homeless Utahns improve their health and quality of life by providing high-quality health care and support services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is The Shack. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY: $52,300 · OtherWEBER STATE UNIVERSITYKEARNS HIGH SCHOOL: $28,000 · OtherKEARNS HIGH SCHOOLCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH: $25,200 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAHUTAH FOOD BANK: $21,500 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKMARINER'S BETHEL UMC MISSION TEAM: $20,000 · OtherMARINER'S BETHEL UMC MISSION TEAMST ANNE'S CENTER: $13,000 · OtherST ANNE'S CENTERUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · OtherELIZABETH STEWART TREEHOUSE MUSEUM: $11,000 · OtherNEMOURS FUND FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $8,000 · Other+12 more: $41,700 · Other+12 moreHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $19,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUND…SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $17,700 · HealthSEAGER MEMORIAL CLINI…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RE…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $14,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIO…+2 more: $2,500 · HealthSAM DAY FOUNDATION: $22,000 · Food & NutritionAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,650 · Human ServicesUTAH FFA FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Human ServicesNeighborhood House Association: $2,000 · Human ServicesOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationLORD BALTIMORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PT: $5,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationJOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SHACK: $2,000 · Religion
Other$231,700Health$69,200Food & Nutrition$22,000Human Services$18,650Education$16,000Arts & Culture$4,000Religion$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAM DAY FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $21,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC: $17,700 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $13,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $12,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH FFA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetJOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHACK: $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMidtown Community Health Center Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAM DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LORD BALTIMORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PT ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FFA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SHACK ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
  • Who funds Utah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness ↗
  • Who funds Midtown Community Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Intermountain Communi…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Ihc Health Services I…Sorenson Legacy Found…Douglas & Shelley Fel…Rich Junior E & Blanc…C Scott & Dorothy E W…Willard L Eccles Char…Larry H Miller and Ga…The Community Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…
Intermountain Community Care Foundation IncUT15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Douglas & Shelley Felt Family Found · Rich Junior E & Blanche B Fdn · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glasmann Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glasmann Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Joshua M Freeman Foundation: 20% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glasmann’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home