· Private foundation
Glasmann Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY | $8,000 |
| MARINER'S BETHEL UMC MISSION TEAM | $5,000 |
| SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC | $4,700 |
| UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY | $4,000 |
| ELIZABETH STEWART TREEHOUSE MUSEUM | $3,000 |
| SAM DAY FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| UTAH FOOD BANK | $3,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES | $3,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $3,000 |
| LANTERN HOUSE | $2,000 |
| DISABILITY LAW CENTER (DLC) UTAH | $2,000 |
| KEARNS HIGH SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| UTAH FFA FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SAM DAY FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +280%- UFUTAH FOOD BANK6× · 2020–2025 · $22k · revenue +53%
- HCHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2023 · $19k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- LPLDS PHILANTHROPIESone grant, 2017 · $6k
- LBLORD BALTIMORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PTgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue ×15
- PSPHILLIP SHOWELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
The organization's purpose is focused on improving and advancing health care in utah to be more affordable, with better health outcomes by accelerating, enabling and promoting healthcare innovation.
Fundraising for healthcare to support patient care, medical education, and clinical research for University of Utah Hospitals & Clinics and other similar nonprofit organizations.
The Utah Medical Association is a professional resource for member physicians providing educational opportunities and dissemination of medical knowledge and practices.
World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.
Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…
The Utah Taxpayer's Association was founded as a nonprofit, nonpartisan voluntary organization of approxiamately 2,800 businesses, professionals and individuals who work together for more efficient and effective government. The…
To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
Help homeless Utahns improve their health and quality of life by providing high-quality health care and support services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is The Shack. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAM DAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEAGER MEMORIAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds OGDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LORD BALTIMORE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PT ↗
- Who funds JOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UTAH FFA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SHACK ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
- Who funds Utah Support Advocates for Recovery Awareness ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Midtown Community Health Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Douglas & Shelley Felt Family Found · Rich Junior E & Blanche B Fdn · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glasmann Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Joshua M Freeman Foundation — 20% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.