Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gismondi Family Foundation Co Mr John

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$602k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$307k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Education$2.2MFood & Nutrition$250kArts & Culture$200kHuman Services$175kHealth$107kCrime & Legal$100kPhilanthropy$31kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$1.3M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
  • $250k+1 grant · $307k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$306,500
ALLEGHENY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION$100,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$40,000
CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $100k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH: $75k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 7 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$3.4M
$894k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+37%

Still filing today

57%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +40%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2018–2024 · $102k · revenue +26%
  • CL
    CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH
    3× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • GP
    GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +91%
  • CL
    CIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2017 · $200k · revenue -21%
  • FC
    FAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

2
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
3
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
4
Pennsylvania State Education Association

We support, empower, and advocate for members, students, and public education.

5
Pennsylvania Municipal League

The mission of the pennsylvania municipal league is to represent the interests of its membership and to serve local government by providing programs and cost-effective services and legislation, which strengthens the autonomy of…

6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
Youth Enrichment Services Inc

Youth enrichment services, inc. was founded in 1994 for the purpose of providing at-risk teens and low-income families residing in allegheny county a comprehensive in-home peer mentoring program, juvenile alternative to detention,…

Human Services
8
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
9
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
10
Allegheny Conference On Community Development

See schedule othe allegheny conference on community development (accd) and affiliates - the greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (chamber), the pennsylvania economy league of greater pittsburgh(pelgp) and the pittsburgh regional alliance…

11
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

12
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $2,142,904 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH+2 more — $100,000 · EducationCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH — $642,800 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF PITT…CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH — $300,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGHCARNEGIE LIBRARY — $120,000 · OtherCARNEGIE LIBRARYUPMC MAGEE-WOMENS HOSPITAL — $95,000 · OtherUPMC MAGEE-WOMENS HOSPITALUNION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $94,000 · OtherUNION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT+6 more — $100,583 · Other+6 moreGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $250,000 · Food & NutritionCIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $200,000 · Arts & CultureFAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH — $75,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc — $101,667 · HealthYOUNG ADULT SURVIVORS UNITED — $5,000 · HealthALLEGHENY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$2,242,904Other$1,352,383Food & Nutrition$250,000Arts & Culture$200,000Human Services$175,000Health$106,667Crime & Legal$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $2,142,904 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCIVIC LIGHT OPERA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH — $200,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $101,667 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNTY BAR FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PGH — $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG ADULT SURVIVORS UNITED — $5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetGRANTMAKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $1,083 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family FoundationsPA19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Fisa Foundation · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation · The Benter Foundation · McAuley Ministries · The Buhl Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Upmc Group

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gismondi Family Foundation Co Mr John funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph