· Private foundation
The Roy H Rogers Foundation Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $87k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GINNY L CLEMENTS BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | $56,000 |
| U OF A FOUNDATIONICA | $25,000 |
| ST PIUS CHURCH | $16,700 |
| U OF A FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| HOMICIDE SURVIVORS INC | $10,000 |
| GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
| SISTER JOSE WOMEN'S CENTER | $10,000 |
| EMPOWER COALITION | $8,000 |
| TUCSON CONQUISTADORS | $5,500 |
| COACHES FOR CHARITY | $750 |
| U OF A FOUNDATIONFATHERS DAY COUNCIL | $700 |
| RMHC OF SOUTHERN AZ | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAngel Charity for Children Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $103k · revenue +90%
- ECEMPOWER COALITION INC3× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +74%
- TCTucson Conquistadores Inc3× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- ARAZ REINED COW HORSE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $16k
- GLGINNY L CLEMENTS BREAT CANCER RESEAone grant, 2017 · $15k
- MAMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.
The mission of the chidrens advocacy center of southern arizona is to provide a safe, compassionate, healing environment for children who have been a victim or witnessed a crime. vision: provide each child with the safety they need to tell…
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.
Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…
The mission of SSVDP is to promote the spiritual growth of its members through prayer, friendship, and service to others.
CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.
Continuing to provide funds and leadership to organizations supporting youth and special needs athletes in Southern Arizona.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Blake Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Girl Power 2 Cure Dba Rett University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Angel Charity for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Tucson Conquistadores Inc ↗
- Who funds Homicide Survivors Inc ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona ↗
- Who funds PATRONATO SAN XAVIER ↗
- Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
- Who funds PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds REID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORIC BLOCK INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds GOOTTER-JENSEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GABRIELS ANGELS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust · Ashton Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Lapan Memorial Sunshine Foundation Inc · William and Mary Ross Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Russell D Garrett Foundation · You Got This Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Roy H Rogers Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Roy H Rogers Foundation Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Roy H Rogers Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.