Skip to content

· Public charity

Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare

In collaboration with patients, families and partners, Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare (Gillette) redefines what is possible for children with brain, bone and movement conditions through clinical leadership, research and global advocacy.

$89k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$304kCommunity Improvement$53kEducation$14k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $33,850, the rows itemized in this filing. The $89,249 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $55,399 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
$11,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$514M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Development Medicine$13,100
Ronald McDonald House Charities Upper Midwest$11,000
St Paul Area Chamber of Commerce$9,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Black Business Enterprises Fund: $14k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 6 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$270k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ACADEMY FOR CEREBRAL PALSY AND DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $59k · revenue +56%
  • SP
    SAINT PAUL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $53k · revenue +86%
  • RH
    REGIONS HOSPITAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $40k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • CP
    CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +123%
  • BB
    Black Business Enterprises Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $14k · revenue +2%
  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
4
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
5
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
The Parent Project for Muscular Dystrophy Research Inc

The parent project muscular dystrophy (ppmd) fights to end duchenne. we accelerate research, raise our voices to impact policy, demand optimal care for every single family, and strive to ensure access to approved therapies.

Human Services
8
Care Providers of Minnesota Foundation

To promote quality care in long term health care facilities through education and research.

—
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Epilepsy Foundation of America

To improve the lives of peoples affected by epilepsy through education, advocacy, research, and connection.

Health
11
Rush Copley Medical Center

To improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
12
The Medical Device Innovation Consortium

Break down barriers in the medical technology life cycle to accelerate innovation and adoption of safe, effective and high-quality medical technologies.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cerebral Palsy Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Black Business Enterprises Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · HealthCEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INCAMERICAN ACADEMY FOR CEREBRAL PALSY AND DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE: $59,100 · HealthAMERICAN ACADEMY FOR CEREBRAL PALSY AND DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINEMARCH OF DIMES INC: $51,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCREGIONS HOSPITAL: $40,000 · HealthREGIONS HOSPITALEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC: $35,250 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INCRonald McDonald House Charities - Upper Midwest: $31,500 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities - Upper Midwest+2 more: $12,000 · HealthSAINT PAUL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $52,947 · OtherSAINT PAUL AREA …Black Business Enterprises Fund: $14,000 · Human Services
Health$303,850Other$52,947Human Services$14,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY FOR CEREBRAL PALSY AND DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE: $59,100 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSAINT PAUL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $52,947 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $51,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONS HOSPITAL: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC: $35,250 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities - Upper Midwest: $31,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBlack Business Enterprises Fund: $14,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY VOICES OF MINNESOTA: $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph