Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gilbert Renze Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$67k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$318kRecreation & Sports$73kArts & Culture$47kHuman Services$42kEducation$26kYouth Development$13kPublic Benefit$12kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
City of Wall Lake IA$6,800
Sac Community Center$5,000
City of Lanesboro Iowa$5,000
City of Odebolt IA$5,000
City of Early Iowa$5,000
Breda Day Care Center Inc$5,000
Lakeview Iowa Historical Society$5,000
Carroll Are Child Care$5,000
City of Schaller IA$5,000
Manning Betterment Foundation$5,000
City of Lytton Iowa$4,000
Lake View Foundation$3,961
Individual grant recipient$3,000
City of Lake View Iowa$2,500
Sac County ISU Extensuon Office$2,139
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Opportunity Living: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$367k · 12 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
23

Total granted

$367k
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

0%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    City of Wall Lake IA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $98k
  • CO
    City of Lake View Iowa
    6× · 2017–2025 · $41k
  • AF
    ARCADIA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2018–2023 · $33k

Funded once

  • CO
    City of Sac City Iowa
    one grant, 2023 · $16k
  • ES
    East Sac County Sshool
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • LW
    Lil Wildcat Energy Center
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carroll Public Library Foundation

To raise funds in Carroll, Iowa to be used for the benefit of the Carroll Public Library

Education
2
Iowa Automotive Heritage Foundation
Science & Tech
3
Sac Community Foundation Inc

Support & promote sac city, ia

Philanthropy
4
La Crosse City Vision Foundation Inc
—
5
City of Prairie Du Chien Fire Assoc Inc

Support the City of Prairie du Chien Fire Department.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Endow Glidden

To establish an endowment fund to enhance the quality of life of the citizens of Glidden, Iowa

Philanthropy
7
All Iowa Lawn Tennis Club Foundation
Recreation & Sports
8
Crane Area Schools Education Foundation Inc
Education
9
Cady Learning Center Foundation

Educating the public on the role of the courts in society

—
10
Iowa West Foundation
—
11
Iowa Rugby Collective Foundation
Recreation & Sports
12
Oelwein Fire Fighters Foundation Inc

The oelwein fire fighres foundation is founded to help support the oelwein fire department in fire protection of the citizens of oelwein, iowa.

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carroll Firefighters Association; the most unlike its peers is Angels Forever Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
3/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

City of Wall Lake IA: $97,794 · OtherCity of Wall Lake IACity of Lake View Iowa: $41,000 · OtherCity of Lake View IowaARCADIA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION: $33,289 · OtherARCADIA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATIONCity of Odebolt IA: $32,810 · OtherCity of Odebolt IACity of Dedham IA: $28,904 · OtherCity of Dedham IACity of Schaller IA: $25,000 · OtherBREDA DAY CARE CENTER INC: $22,000 · OtherCity of Auburn Iowa: $18,393 · OtherCity of Early Iowa: $17,864 · Other+25 more: $176,503 · Other+25 moreGlidden Area Firefighters Association: $24,750 · Public Safety & DisasterCARROLL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMat Rats Wrestling Club: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsSAC COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsKUEMPER CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · EducationIOWA LIONS FOUNDATION: $9,895 · HealthMANNING BETTERMENT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Community ImprovementLAKE VIEW FOUNDATION: $3,961 · Community ImprovementANGELS FOREVER INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$493,557Public Safety & Disaster$29,750Recreation & Sports$12,500Education$12,000Health$9,895Community Improvement$8,961Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGlidden Area Firefighters Association: $24,750 over 3y, 38% of budgetBREDA DAY CARE CENTER INC: $22,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetKUEMPER CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetIOWA LIONS FOUNDATION: $9,895 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSac County Conservation Foundation: $9,718 over 1y, 90% of budgetMat Rats Wrestling Club: $7,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetSAC COMMUNITY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMANNING BETTERMENT FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANGELS FOREVER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetLAKE VIEW FOUNDATION: $3,961 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetALL STRINGS ATTACHED: $3,950 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Glidden Area Firefighters Association ↗
  • Who funds BREDA DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KUEMPER CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA LIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Sac County Conservation Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Mat Rats Wrestling Club ↗
  • Who funds SAC COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MANNING BETTERMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARROLL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS FOREVER INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKE VIEW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALL STRINGS ATTACHED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Warren Htimmerman Charitable TrustIA26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Warren Htimmerman Charitable Trust · Comm Foundation of Carroll County Inc · Iowa Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gilbert Renze Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gilbert Renze Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gilbert Renze’s filings →

    More from the funding graph