Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Warren Htimmerman Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$163k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Community Improvement$328kRecreation & Sports$190kPublic Benefit$169kPublic Safety & Disaster$140kHealth$117kEducation$93kHuman Services$76kFood & Nutrition$54kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $78k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$40,295
ZION LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL MANNING$22,980
CARROLL CO CONSERVATION BOARD$15,000
NEW HOPE VILLAGE FOUNDATION$9,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
CITY OF LANESBORO$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
WESTERN IOWA EMS K9 ASSOC$6,130
ENDOWGLIDDEN$5,920
BREDA RECREATION LEAGUE$5,000
CARROLL DEPOT CENTRE LTD$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CITY OF COON RAPIDS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
CITY OF MANNING$3,275
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OPPORTUNITY LIVING: $2k → 9%ELDERBRIDGE AGENCY ON AGING: $2k → 12%MAIN STREET COON RAPIDS: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 24 repeat orgs$263k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
27

Total granted

$1.0M
$189k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+28%

Still filing today

46%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MANNING BETTERMENT FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $181k · revenue +63%
  • MC
    MANNING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2025 · $106k · revenue +29%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE VILLAGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • IC
    IKM-MANNING COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $29k
  • KK
    Kellans Kingdom
    one grant, 2018 · $19k · revenue -87%
  • HF
    HALBUR FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marshalltown Central Business District Inc

Promote the community's (that being marshalltown, iowa) economic development and the revitalization and historic preservation of the downtown.

Community Improvement
2
Carroll Public Library Foundation

To raise funds in Carroll, Iowa to be used for the benefit of the Carroll Public Library

Education
3
Iowa Specialty Hospital Foundation - Clarion
Health
4
Carroll Firefighters Association

To provide emergency fire services to the citizens of Carroll, Iowa and to assist the Carroll Volunteer Fire Department in the execution and performance of its responsibilities to the citizens of Carroll, Iowa

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Mandt Community Centerinc

Maintain a community center that includes an ice skating rink during the winter months and holds various events during the summer months that are open to the public.

Arts & Culture
6
Iowa Automotive Heritage Foundation
Science & Tech
7
Clark Community Aquatic Center

The organizations mission is to replace and upgrade the local pool.

Philanthropy
8
Graettinger Economic Development Council

Engage in, assist and contribute to the support of economical and industrial development of the city of graettinger, iowa, including the assistance, encouragement and preservation of existing businesses and industries

Recreation & Sports
9
Garner Main Street Inc

Promote needs of community, citizens, and downtown area.

Recreation & Sports
10
Corning Community Foundation

To provide facilities and services especially designed to meet the physical, social, recreational, educational, cultural or other needs of the Corning Community and to promote the quality of life for persons of all ages living, working and…

Philanthropy
11
Casey Service Club Inc

Provide service to the casey area.

Community Improvement
12
Faithful Friends of Carroll Manor Inc
Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Manning Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Community of Concern. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Hospital SystemsDomestic Violence and Sexua…Classical Music OrchestrasSenior Support ServicesFood Pantries and AssistanceDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Sports Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 32. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number13%16%<5yr11%24%5–10yr14%11%10–20yr14%22%20–35yr17%27%35–55yr31%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value13%4%<5yr11%10%5–10yr14%7%10–20yr14%41%20–35yr17%38%35–55yr31%0%55yr+

The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 16% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 3% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
3%6/174

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/25
Grantees still filing
12/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF MANNING — $160,368 · OtherCITY OF MANNINGMANNING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $106,295 · OtherMANNING COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $69,999 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITY OF COON RAPIDS — $50,319 · OtherNEW HOPE VILLAGE FOUNDATION — $49,889 · OtherBREDA DAY CARE CENTER INC — $48,391 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $44,485 · OtherMANNING COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $38,518 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $33,000 · Other+38 more — $353,317 · Other+38 moreMANNING BETTERMENT FOUNDATION — $181,171 · Community ImprovementMANNING BETTERMENT …MAIN STREET MANNING — $16,152 · Community ImprovementMAIN STREET MANNINGARCADIA BETTERMENT DEVELOPMENT CORP — $15,550 · Community ImprovementARCADIA BETTERMENT …Carroll Athletic Association — $10,000 · Community ImprovementMANNING REGIONAL HEALTHCARE CENTER — $31,900 · HealthGlidden Area Firefighters Association — $24,148 · Public Safety & DisasterMANNING FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOC INC — $6,000 · Public Safety & DisasterKUEMPER CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $21,750 · EducationCARROLL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $6,500 · EducationKellans Kingdom — $18,500 · Recreation & SportsBREDA RECREATION LEAGUE — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsALL STRINGS ATTACHED — $8,057 · Arts & CultureCARROLL CHILDRENS MUSEUM — $5,000 · Arts & CultureCarroll Depot Centre Ltd — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$954,581Community Improvement$222,873Health$31,900Public Safety & Disaster$30,148Education$28,250Recreation & Sports$23,500Arts & Culture$18,057

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMANNING BETTERMENT FOUNDATION — $181,171 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetMANNING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $106,295 over 3y, 13% of budgetNEW HOPE VILLAGE FOUNDATION — $49,889 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetMANNING COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $38,518 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetMANNING REGIONAL HEALTHCARE CENTER — $31,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCARROLL AREA CHILD CARE CENTER AND PRESCHOOL — $24,365 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGlidden Area Firefighters Association — $24,148 over 4y, 29% of budgetKUEMPER CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $21,750 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKellans Kingdom — $18,500 over 1y, 14% of budgetMAIN STREET MANNING — $16,152 over 3y, 10% of budgetARCADIA BETTERMENT DEVELOPMENT CORP — $15,550 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetCENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA — $8,300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetALL STRINGS ATTACHED — $8,057 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetCARROLL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 1y, 43% of budgetMANNING FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOC INC — $6,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetEndow Glidden — $5,920 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCARROLL CHILDRENS MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetBREDA RECREATION LEAGUE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMAIN STREET COON RAPIDS — $4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetElderbridge Agency on Aging — $1,662 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MANNING BETTERMENT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MANNING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NEW HOPE VILLAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BREDA DAY CARE CENTER INC
  • Who funds MANNING COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds MANNING REGIONAL HEALTHCARE CENTER
  • Who funds CARROLL AREA CHILD CARE CENTER AND PRESCHOOL
  • Who funds Glidden Area Firefighters Association
  • Who funds KUEMPER CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Kellans Kingdom
  • Who funds MAIN STREET MANNING
  • Who funds ARCADIA BETTERMENT DEVELOPMENT CORP
  • Who funds COMMUNITY OF CONCERN
  • Who funds Carroll Athletic Association
  • Who funds CENTERS AGAINST ABUSE & SEXUAL ASSA
  • Who funds ALL STRINGS ATTACHED
  • Who funds CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MANNING FIRE AND RESCUE ASSOC INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iowa Savings Bank Charitable FoundationIA39× affinity16 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iowa Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Comm Foundation of Carroll County Inc · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Gilbert Renze Charitable Foundation · Roswell and Elizabeth Garst Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Warren Htimmerman Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph