· Private foundation
Iowa Savings Bank Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORLD FOOD PRIZE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| ENDOW GLIDDEN | $5,000 |
| 25 CHI (CORRIDOR HOUSING INITIATIVE) | $2,500 |
| COMMUNITY OF CONCERN FOOD PANTRY | $2,000 |
| CARROLL COUNTY FAIR BOARD | $1,000 |
| UNITED FUND OF COON RAPIDS & UNION TOWNSHIP | $1,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $500 |
| GUTHRIE COUNTY FAIR FOUNDATION | $500 |
| MAIN STREET COON RAPIDS | $500 |
| STEWART MEMORIAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $500 |
| COON RAPIDS MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION | $500 |
| GLIDDEN UNITED CHARITIES | $500 |
| ST JOHN PAUL II CATHOLIC PARISH | $450 |
| CALHOUN COUNTY EXPOSITION | $400 |
| NEW HOPE VILLAGE FOUNDATION | $400 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
57 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MSMAIN STREET COON RAPIDS6× · 2020–2025 · $63k · revenue +802% · 61% of their budget
- WFWorld Food Prize Foundation6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +51%
- COCOMMUNITY OF CONCERN5× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- LWLIL WILDCAT EDUCATION CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +75%
- FOFRIENDS OF COMMUNITY MEMORIAL BUILDING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k
- COCITY OF LAKE CITYone grant, 2024 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To work with farmers, rural communities and cosumers to promote a viable system of family agriculture and a high qualtiy of life in rural communities through education , cooperation and community activism.
Raise funds to support the dallas county fair association; provide fundraising efforts to improve the infrastructure and programming provided to the residents of dallas county iowa.
To provide a county fair for rural iowa
The organization promotes, develops and advances the business community in iowa city and the surrounding area. in addition, the organization connects business and industry with federal, state and local resources to enable and stimulate…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iowa Agriculture Literacy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is World Food Prize Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 55. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 8% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 4% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAIN STREET COON RAPIDS ↗
- Who funds World Food Prize Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OF CONCERN ↗
- Who funds KUEMPER CATHOLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CARROLL COUNTY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIL WILDCAT EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE VILLAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHITEROCK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Endow Glidden ↗
- Who funds Carroll Athletic Association ↗
- Who funds Comm Foundation of Carroll County Inc ↗
- Who funds IOWA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALL STRINGS ATTACHED ↗
- Who funds CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY LIVING ↗
- Who funds BREDA DAY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CARROLL AREA CHILD CARE CENTER AND PRESCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Warren Htimmerman Charitable Trust · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Comm Foundation of Carroll County Inc · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Roswell and Elizabeth Garst Foundation · Iowa State Bank Charitable Foundation · Gilbert Renze Charitable Foundation · Raccoon Valley Bank Charitable Foundation · Home State Bank Charitable Foundation · Krause Gentle Foundation · New Charitable Foundation · Siouxland Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Iowa Savings Bank Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Harvard Krokodiloes Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Iowa Savings Bank Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Iowa Savings Bank Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.