Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gil Moore Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$152kEducation$52kHuman Services$21kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kPublic Benefit$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$5,950
Median grant
2
States reached
$296k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT RIDE$15,000
ELK GROVE REGIONAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUN$6,000
END OF WATCH FUND$5,950
ACEING AUTISM$5,000
HEART OF JB$3,080
THE LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SENIOR CENTER OF ELK GROVE: $8k → 12%HEART OF JB: $3k → 12%HEART OF JB: $3k → 12%SENIOR CENTER OF ELK GROVE: $2k → 12%ELK GROVE FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%ELK GROVE FOOD BANK: $2k → 12%SENIOR CENTER OF ELK GROVE: $2k → 12%CHICKS IN CRISIS: $1k → 12%CHICKS IN CRISIS: $942 → 12%CHICKS IN CRISIS: $184 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$284k · 18 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
14

Total granted

$284k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+21%

Still filing today

83%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentReligionEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    Project Ride Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $111k · revenue +50%
  • EG
    Elk Grove Community Foundation
    6× · 2019–2024 · $49k · revenue +13%
  • SC
    SENIOR CENTER OF ELK GROVE INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $12k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CF
    CONSUMNES FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • GL
    GALT LIONS CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • RF
    Runnin For Rhettgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +106%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Elk Grove Rotary Foundation

The organization is a public charity serving southern sacramento county, california in general, and the city of elk grove in particular. it also raises funds for international projects in alignment with rotary international.

Education
2
Elk Grove Youth Sports Foundation

Identify underpriviledged children who are unable to afford to participate in recreational youth sports leagues and solicit, receive, hold, and distribute monies on behalf of such underprivileged children for the payment of recreational…

Recreation & Sports
3
Elk Grove Adult Community Training Inc

To provide for the equality, diginity and fulfillment of rights of developmentally disabled individuals through training programs providing opportunities for individual choice in community and employment.

Human Services
4
The Elm Grove Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Elk Grove Optimist Foundation

Assist needy families and children in the Elk Grove, CA area

Youth Development
6
Eagle Ridge Youth Ranch

Equine services offered to disadvantaged youth.

Human Services
7
Elgin Cares
Human Services
8
All About Equine Animal Rescue Inc

Rescue and rehabilitate abused, neglected, abandoned, unwanted, and/or slaughter-bound animals primarily equines wild and domestic To provide food, shelter, care and veterinary care, to utilize a strategic process for matching healthy,…

Animals
9
Friends of Elk Grove Animal Shelter

Our mission statement is not only a mission its a passion! passion for unwanted, abused, stray, and abandoned animals. all animals are precious, and we have a duty to provide them with care and loving, forever home.

Animals
10
Elk Grove Hart Home Assistance Resource Team

To provide housing and services for homeless individuals and families.

Human Services
11
Eva Leah Gunther Foundation

To support the physical, social, moral, intellectual, creative, spiritual, psychological and emotional growth of girls ages 11-18.

Philanthropy
12
Elk Grove Musical Theatre Company Jr

We teach children acting, dance, and vocal skills. The teaching culminates in high-quality, low cost children's and youth theatrical performances. We serve all children including differently abled youth and socioeconomically challenged…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elk Grove Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Heart of Jb. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAgricultural Industry Assoc…Holistic Support ServicesYouth Performing Arts Educa…Community Support ServicesHospital System Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr17%45%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%30%35–55yr15%0%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr17%23%10–20yr17%3%20–35yr11%71%35–55yr15%0%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
1,189/8,890

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Project Ride Inc — $111,072 · OtherProject Ride IncEND OF WATCH FUND — $39,467 · OtherEND OF WATCH FUNDCONSUMNES FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION — $6,510 · Other+15 more — $25,642 · Other+15 moreElk Grove Community Foundation — $49,457 · PhilanthropyElk Grove Communit…+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropySUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $32,285 · HealthSUTTER MEDICAL…ACEING AUTISM INC — $5,000 · HealthACEING AUTISM …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,500 · Health+2 more — $1,250 · HealthSENIOR CENTER OF ELK GROVE INC — $11,564 · Human ServicesHEART OF JB — $5,798 · Human ServicesElk Grove Food Bank — $3,882 · Human ServicesChicks in Crisis Inc — $2,469 · Human ServicesELK GROVE LIONS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesWEST COAST EQUINE FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Recreation & SportsSTRAUSS FESTIVAL OF ELK GROVE INC — $3,545 · Arts & CultureELK GROVE FINE ARTS CENTER INC — $1,617 · Arts & CultureRunnin For Rhett — $2,880 · Education
Other$182,691Philanthropy$50,457Health$40,035Human Services$24,713Recreation & Sports$8,000Arts & Culture$5,162Education$2,880

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetProject Ride Inc — $111,072 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetElk Grove Community Foundation — $49,457 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetSUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $32,285 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSENIOR CENTER OF ELK GROVE INC — $11,564 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWEST COAST EQUINE FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetHEART OF JB — $5,798 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetACEING AUTISM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetELK GROVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $4,318 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetElk Grove Food Bank — $3,882 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTRAUSS FESTIVAL OF ELK GROVE INC — $3,545 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetRunnin For Rhett — $2,880 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetChicks in Crisis Inc — $2,469 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $1,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetX Hope Inc — $1,584 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Farmland Trust — $1,252 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GALT HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetASIAN RESOURCES INC — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THEM ALL HORSE RESCUE — $544 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREAMER TO DREAM — $232 over 1y, 5.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sacramento Region Com…K & A Spease Foundati…Sierra Health Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodThe Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
Sacramento Region Community FoundationCA27.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · K & A Spease Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gil Moore Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home