Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gerald D and Edna E Mann Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$904k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of GERALD D AND EDNA E MANN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $425k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$400,000
NC STATE ENGINEERING FOUNDATION$200,000
UNION UNIVERSITY$100,000
ST LUKE'S CHURCH$75,000
BOILMAKER ALLIANCE$50,000
NEWPORT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$30,000
ROTARY FOUNDATION OF INDIANAPOLIS$20,000
NEWPORT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$7,000
ST JAMES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$1,240
INDIANAPOLIS HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
WAWASEE AREA CONSERVANCY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WHEELER MISSION: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
MO
KY
VA
TN
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$799k · 9 repeat orgs$618k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$799k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-2%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $582k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NC STATE ENGINEERING FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $400k · revenue +162%
  • UC
    UNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $140k · revenue +10%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -28%
  • NH
    NEWPORT HISTORICAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY INDIANA DIVISION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
5
Colgate University

Colgate university's mission is to provide a demanding, expansive educational experience to a select group of diverse, talented, intellectually sophisticated students who are capable of challenging themselves, their peers and their…

Education
6
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
7
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
8
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

9
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
10
Trevecca Nazarene University

Trevecca nazarene university is a private, co-educational, christian liberal arts university. the university exists to carry out the educational mission of the church by means of academic programs that promote scholarship, critical…

Education
11
LeTourneau University

Letourneau university is a comprehensive institution of christian higher education where educators engage learners to nurture christian virtue, to develop competency and ingenuity in their professional fields, to integrate faith and work,…

Education
12
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Theological Seminary and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYNEWPORT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC — $139,000 · OtherNEWPORT CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INCST LUKE'S CHURCH — $90,000 · OtherST LUKE'S CHURCH+9 more — $38,550 · Other+9 moreNC STATE ENGINEERING FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 · EducationNC STATE ENGINEERING FOUNDATION INCUNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY — $140,000 · EducationUNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITYUNION UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationUNION UNIVERSITY+4 more — $16,240 · EducationBOILERMAKER ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 · Community ImprovementROTARY FOUNDATION OF INDIANAPOLIS INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $16,000 · ReligionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $4,000 · HealthWAWASEE AREA CONSERVANCY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EnvironmentWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$667,550Education$656,240Community Improvement$70,000Religion$16,000Health$4,000Environment$2,000Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNC STATE ENGINEERING FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY — $140,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNION UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOILERMAKER ALLIANCE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetROTARY FOUNDATION OF INDIANAPOLIS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES YACHT CLUB BLUE GAVEL SCHOLARSHIP SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $4,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWAWASEE AREA CONSERVANCY FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLaw Enforcement Legal Defense Fund — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTLANE LEARNING CORP — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLandmark Legal Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FORT TICONDEROGA ASSOCIATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gerald D and Edna E Mann Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph