Skip to content

· Private foundation

Georgia and Carroll Thomas Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$1.1MReligion$983kHuman Services$724kHealth$694kFood & Nutrition$315kPhilanthropy$170kYouth Development$95kHousing & Shelter$75kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 31 grants below total $1,864,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,170,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $306,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $254k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $575k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Texas Tech Foundation$1,000,000
Focus on the Family$100,000
CRU (Campus Crusade for Christ)$75,000
Youth With a Mission$50,000
Baylor MD Fellows Program$50,000
Baylor Scott & White Central Texas Foundation$50,000
YMCA of the Rockies$50,000
MD Anderson Cancer Center$50,000
West Texas Food Bank$50,000
Denison Ministries$50,000
Midland Memorial Foundation$50,000
North Texas Food Bank$30,000
CRU (Campus Crusade for Christ)$30,000
First Baptist Church Midland$25,000
Parkinson's Foundation$25,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 30 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
3

Total granted

$4.1M
$54k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +68%
  • YMCA OF THE ROCKIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +48%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    4× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • LC
    Life Center (Senior Life)
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • FO
    Folds of Honor- NT
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • AF
    Amer. Found. For Suicide Prevention
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
3
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
4
University of North Texas Foundation Inc

The university of north texas foundation, inc. serves as unt's strategic partner in managing and growing private assets for support of the university's mission. untf's continuity, flexibility, and creative solutions contribute to fully…

Philanthropy
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Forty First Foundation

The forty first foundation supports and advances the university of texas at austin in its pursuit of excellence. we work closely with the office of the president to identify, fund, and implement strategic initiatives that enhance the…

Education
7
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
8
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
9
Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

The foundation is committed to serving charitable needs both domestically and abroad through charitable grants and services at the discretion of the board of trustees.

Philanthropy
10
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
11
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
12
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Midland Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ymca of the Rockies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $419,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $379,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCMD Anderson Cancer Center: $225,000 · OtherMD Anderson Cancer CenterWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $200,000 · OtherWEST TEXAS FOOD BANKDENISON MINISTRIES: $180,000 · OtherDENISON MINISTRIESBaylor Scott & White Central Texas Foundation: $150,000 · OtherBaylor Scott & White Central Texas FoundationFirst Baptist Church Midland: $150,000 · OtherFirst Baptist Church MidlandNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $115,000 · OtherAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $102,000 · OtherMIDLAND MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Other+15 more: $551,000 · Other+15 moreTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,015,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $40,000 · EducationYOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO: $145,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $70,000 · HealthYMCA OF THE ROCKIES: $200,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$2,571,000Education$1,055,000Health$290,000Human Services$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,015,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROCKIES: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO: $145,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $115,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION OF COLO ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RISE SCHOOL OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Henry Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Georgia and Carroll Thomas Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Georgia and Carroll Thomas Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Georgia and Carroll Thomas Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph