Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George Washington Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$301k
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$2,100
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$14,175
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$6,300
WENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE$5,250
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$3,850
WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$3,150
CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$3,150
COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE$3,150
PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE$2,358
BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,100
SPOKANE FALLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,100
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY$2,100
WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$2,100
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$2,100
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN$1,575
CARROLL COLLEGE$1,575
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-LINCOLN: $2k → 13%BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%NOTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%University of Idaho: $2k → 16%CARROLL COLLEGE: $2k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN: $1k → 12%GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%Warner Pacific University: $1k → 12%CORBAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 14%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 18%BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $1k → 8%WENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE: $5k → 9%COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE: $3k → 11%Central Washington University: $7k → 11%WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%Spokane Falls Community College: $2k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 14%Perry Technical Institute: $6k → 17%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%WENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE: $4k → 9%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%SPOKANE FALLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 12%BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 14%PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $4k → 17%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%SPOKANE FALLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 12%PERRY TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $2k → 17%GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $9k → 9%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%Northwest University: $3k → 9%WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%SPOKANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 12%Spokane Community College: $2k → 12%SPOKANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 12%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $9k → 12%Eastern Washington University: $5k → 12%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
OR
OH
CT
UT
NE
VA
AZ
AR

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$283k · 33 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
15

Total granted

$283k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+1%

Still filing today

39%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $7k · revenue +40%
  • GC
    Grand Canyon University
    2× · 2022–2025 · $4k · revenue +22%
  • SM
    SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Idaho
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • WS
    Washington State Univers TriCities
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
2
University of Portland

The university of portland, an independently governed catholic university guided by the congregation of holy cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
3
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
6
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
7
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
8
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Pacific University and the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY — $56,725 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $36,050 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONEASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $27,650 · OtherEASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYCentral Washington University — $22,750 · OtherCentral Washington UniversityPerry Technical Institute — $14,692 · OtherPerry Technical InstituteWESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $12,600 · OtherWENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE — $10,150 · OtherYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $8,750 · Other+29 more — $70,000 · Other+29 moreWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY — $8,925 · EducationWHITWORTH UNIVE…CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $7,350 · EducationCORPORATION OF …Grand Canyon University — $4,200 · EducationGrand Canyon Un…SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $4,200 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC…CARROLL COLLEGE — $2,625 · EducationCARROLL COLLEGESAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY — $2,100 · EducationHERITAGE UNIVERSITY — $2,100 · EducationBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE — $2,100 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $2,100 · EducationNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC — $2,100 · EducationCORBAN UNIVERSITY — $2,100 · Education+2 more — $2,100 · Education
Other$259,367Education$42,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY — $8,925 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $7,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $4,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST UNIVERSITY — $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL COLLEGE — $2,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE UNIVERSITY — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORBAN UNIVERSITY — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Lutheran University — $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NORTHWEST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CARROLL COLLEGE
  • Who funds SAINT MARTIN'S UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HERITAGE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NAZARENE UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds CORBAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

M J Murdock Charitable TrustWA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Paul Lauzier Scholarship Foundation · Scottish Rite Foundation of Wa Inc Dba Scottish Rite Scholarship Fdn of Wa · Wf & Blanche E West Educational & Coffman Jf · Leo Adler Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization George Washington Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Warner Pacific University8% of income from government
  • Corban University4% of income from government
  • George Fox University3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George Washington Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George Washington Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph