· Private foundation
George Frederick Jewett Foundation East
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k26 grants · $410k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $825k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION | $100,000 |
| IFOSTER | $100,000 |
| MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY | $100,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $75,000 |
| YMCA CAPE COD | $50,000 |
| MILTON ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS ADOPTION RESOURCES EXCHANGE | $50,000 |
| WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| WELLESLEY COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| MONUMENT ACADEMY INC | $50,000 |
| MCLEAN HOSPITAL | $50,000 |
| MYSTIC VALLEY REGIONAL CHARTER SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY - SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT | $50,000 |
| PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE MESSIAH WOODS HOLE | $35,000 |
| ST JAMES SCHOOL | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
43 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WHWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION6× · 2019–2024 · $620k · revenue +32%
- MBMARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY6× · 2019–2024 · $390k · revenue +7%
- WCWellesley College6× · 2019–2024 · $375k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- NCNATIONAL CATHEDERAL SCHOOLone grant, 2019 · $25k
- BTBREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +35%
- YUYALE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dexter Southfield Inc and the most unlike its peers is World Bicycle Relief Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY ↗
- Who funds Wellesley College ↗
- Who funds MONUMENT ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Adoption Resource Exchange Inc ↗
- Who funds iFoster Inc ↗
- Who funds MILTON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds HANDEL AND HAYDN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE LIGHT OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds ALMA DEL MAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds SUBURBAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC ↗
- Who funds NORWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT JAMES SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds FOREST HISTORY SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST ↗
- Who funds CHORUS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL INC ↗
- Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FALMOUTH SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Esther Simon 1952 Charitable Trust Xxxxx8006 · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Martha's Vineyard Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Foundation · Cape Cod Foundation Inc · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George Frederick Jewett Foundation East funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Marine Biological Laboratory — 20% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- Handel and Haydn Society — 2% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Community Music Center of Boston Inc — 1% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to George Frederick Jewett Foundation East?
Find your warmest path to George Frederick Jewett Foundation East through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.