Skip to content
George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$217k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$776kFood & Nutrition$372kHealth$203kCrime & Legal$115kCivil Rights$100kRecreation & Sports$86kReligion$76kHuman Services$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $149k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PETER SCHOOL$96,000
DESTIN HARVEST INC$52,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY OF TENNIS$15,000
CHILD PROTECT CAC (CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER)$15,000
ACT OF CONNECTICUT (A CONTEMPORARY THEATER OF CT)$10,000
IONA PREPARATORY$3,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $367k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $110k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $88k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $53k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $20k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $20k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $17k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $15k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $15k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $15k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$804k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
37

Total granted

$1.2M
$751k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+12%

Still filing today

42%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DESTIN HARVEST INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $367k · revenue +45%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +41%
  • FP
    FATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $25k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -45%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • SP
    SAINT PETER SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $96k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
St Peter's Health Partners

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
3
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
4
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

—
5
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
7
St Peter's Hospital

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. peter's hospital is a member of st. peter's health partners and…

Health
8
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Western Connecticut Health Network Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
12
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is United Way of Monroe County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PETER SCHOOL: $288,000 · OtherST PETER SCHOOLIMMACULATE HIGH SCHOOL: $188,900 · OtherIMMACULATE HIGH SCHOOLTHE FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE: $100,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICESAINT PETER SCHOOL INC: $96,000 · OtherSAINT PETER SCHOOL INCST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDA: $90,000 · OtherST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDAST MARY SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherST MARY SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA: $50,000 · OtherRUDY L RUGGLES BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $45,000 · Other+32 more: $357,617 · Other+32 moreDESTIN HARVEST INC: $367,253 · Human ServicesDESTIN HARVEST INCEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $100,000 · Civil RightsThe Danbury Hospital: $38,000 · HealthFATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $25,000 · HealthST LUKE'S FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationDANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC: $20,500 · EducationSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $2,000 · EducationFoundations in Education Inc: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MONROE COUNTY: $10,500 · PhilanthropyINFUSED IMPACT INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalPALLIATIVE CARE AND EDUCATION FOR RURAL: $10,000 · International
Other$1,340,517Human Services$367,253Civil Rights$100,000Health$63,000Education$47,500Philanthropy$40,500International$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDESTIN HARVEST INC: $367,253 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Danbury Hospital: $38,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundations in Education Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST LUKE'S FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC: $20,500 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MONROE COUNTY: $10,500 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALLIATIVE CARE AND EDUCATION FOR RURAL: $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSPIRICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFUSED IMPACT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $4,521 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DESTIN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds The Danbury Hospital ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundations in Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MONROE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds PALLIATIVE CARE AND EDUCATION FOR RURAL ↗
  • Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Inspirica Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Danbury Hospital: 1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • St Luke's Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George F Landegger’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home