Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$217k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of GEORGE F LANDEGGER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $149k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PETER SCHOOL$96,000
DESTIN HARVEST INC$52,500
Individual grant recipient$25,000
DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY OF TENNIS$15,000
CHILD PROTECT CAC (CHILDREN ADVOCACY CENTER)$15,000
ACT OF CONNECTICUT (A CONTEMPORARY THEATER OF CT)$10,000
IONA PREPARATORY$3,300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $367k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $110k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $88k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $53k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $20k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $20k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $17k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $15k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $15k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $15k → 8%DESTIN HARVEST INC: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$804k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
37

Total granted

$1.2M
$751k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+12%

Still filing today

42%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyInternationalHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DESTIN HARVEST INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $367k · revenue +45%
  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +1%
  • FP
    FATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $25k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -40%
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • SP
    SAINT PETER SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $96k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
St Peter's Health Partners

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.

Health
3
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

4
Saint Mary Home Incorporated

We, mercy community health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming presence within our communities. saint mary home is a member of mercy community health and trinity health.

5
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
7
St Peter's Hospital

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. peter's hospital is a member of st. peter's health partners and…

Health
8
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Western Connecticut Health Network Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

12
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Way of Monroe County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%5%<5yr13%10%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr21%20%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr14%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%9%<5yr13%3%5–10yr20%36%10–20yr21%11%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr14%36%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
11%
3,574/33,169

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST PETER SCHOOL — $288,000 · OtherST PETER SCHOOLIMMACULATE HIGH SCHOOL — $188,900 · OtherIMMACULATE HIGH SCHOOLTHE FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICE — $100,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY AND JUSTICESAINT PETER SCHOOL INC — $96,000 · OtherSAINT PETER SCHOOL INCST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDA — $90,000 · OtherST FRANCIS NAGGALAMA HOSPITAL UGANDAST MARY SCHOOL — $75,000 · OtherST MARY SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA — $50,000 · OtherRUDY L RUGGLES BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $50,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR — $45,000 · Other+32 more — $357,617 · Other+32 moreDESTIN HARVEST INC — $367,253 · Human ServicesDESTIN HARVEST INCEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 · Civil RightsThe Danbury Hospital — $38,000 · HealthFATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $25,000 · HealthST LUKE'S FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · EducationDANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC — $20,500 · EducationSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC — $2,000 · EducationFoundations in Education Inc — $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MONROE COUNTY — $10,500 · PhilanthropyINFUSED IMPACT INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · InternationalPALLIATIVE CARE AND EDUCATION FOR RURAL — $10,000 · International
Other$1,340,517Human Services$367,253Civil Rights$100,000Health$63,000Education$47,500Philanthropy$40,500International$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDESTIN HARVEST INC — $367,253 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Danbury Hospital — $38,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LUKE'S FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoundations in Education Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC — $20,500 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MONROE COUNTY — $10,500 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetPALLIATIVE CARE AND EDUCATION FOR RURAL — $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINFUSED IMPACT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetINSPIRICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $4,521 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DESTIN HARVEST INC
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds The Danbury Hospital
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Foundations in Education Inc
  • Who funds FATHER PURCELL MEMORIAL EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds DANBURY GRASSROOTS ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MONROE COUNTY
  • Who funds PALLIATIVE CARE AND EDUCATION FOR RURAL
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN
  • Who funds CANAAN INSTITUTIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH
  • Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Inspirica Inc30% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc5% of income from government
  • The Danbury Hospital1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • St Luke's Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to George F Landegger Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph