Skip to content

· Private foundation

George & Mary Ann Leal Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$198kHuman Services$144kHousing & Shelter$115kEducation$85kHealth$61kArts & Culture$5kPhilanthropy$4kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD SHEPHERD SHELTER$25,000
VISION OF HOPE$20,000
MATER DOLOROSA RETREAT CENTER$10,500
Individual grant recipient$5,700
HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$5,000
SPORT DISCIPLE$5,000
OUR LADY OF VICTORY CHURCH$4,000
CHRIST THE CHILD SOCIETY$2,500
ST PHILIP CHURCH$2,000
MARYVALE$1,500
ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP$1,500
TACSC$1,200
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY$1,200
LABOURE SOCIETY$1,200
VERBUM DEI HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARYVALE: $2k → 14%MARYVALE: $2k → 14%MARYVALE: $1k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $18k → 14%SOCIAL SERVICE AUXILIARY: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
MI
OR
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$577k · 33 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
9

Total granted

$577k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+8%

Still filing today

27%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $43k · revenue +25%
  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    2× · 2019–2023 · $5k · revenue +20%
  • M
    MARYVALE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CS
    CARMELITE SISTERS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES OPERA
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SO
    STAR OF THE SEA SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
3
Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

—
4
Cabrini Legacy Corporation

See schedule o.education of the heart: cabrini university was a catholic institution of higher education. the cabrini legacy corporation exists to protect the legacy of the former university.cabrini university was a catholic institution of…

Education
5
Saint Mary's College of California

Saint mary's college of california invites you to passionately embrace knowledge, the challenges of scholarship, and the capacity to make lasting change in the world. the foundation for this is our mission. to probe deeply the mystery of…

Education
6
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
7
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
10
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
12
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Los Angeles Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Laboure Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPE: $130,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS VISION OF HOPEGOOD SHEPHERD SHELTER: $115,000 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD SHELTERTHE NORTHWEST CENTER INC: $30,000 · OtherTHE NORTHWEST CENTER INCLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $29,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORMATER DOLOROSA RETREAT CENTER: $28,500 · OtherMATER DOLOROSA RETREAT CENTERST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP: $20,500 · OtherJESUIT WEST PROVINCE: $20,000 · Other+30 more: $126,900 · Other+30 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $42,500 · Human ServicesMARYVALE: $4,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $37,500 · HealthTHE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthSPORT DISCIPLE: $12,700 · Recreation & SportsPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $4,500 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationTHE LABOURE SOCIETY INC: $3,900 · PhilanthropyYOUNG LIFE: $1,500 · Youth DevelopmentPREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $500 · Religion
Other$499,900Human Services$47,000Health$42,500Recreation & Sports$12,700Education$7,000Philanthropy$3,900Youth Development$1,500Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $42,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $37,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORTHWEST CENTER INC: $30,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSPORT DISCIPLE: $12,700 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA TERESITA INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARYVALE: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LABOURE SOCIETY INC: $3,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL SERVICE AUXILIARY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES ↗
  • Who funds THE NORTHWEST CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPORT DISCIPLE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SANTA TERESITA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYVALE ↗
  • Who funds THE LABOURE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA15.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The James J and Sue Femino Foundation · The Michael & Patricia Smith Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George & Mary Ann Leal Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George & Mary Ann Leal Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Willamette University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to George & Mary Ann Leal Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George & Mary Ann Leal Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George & Mary Ann Leal’s filings →

More from the funding graph