Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

George and Deborah Mehl Family Foundation Inc C/O W Stuart Dornette

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$488k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of GEORGE AND DEBORAH MEHL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC C/O W STUART DORNETTE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $288k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY GOSPEL MISSION$68,400
TEEN CHALLENGE OF ARIZONA$60,000
PRECEPT INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$60,000
GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION$50,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$50,000
HANDS FOR HOPE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
KIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION$25,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$25,000
LIFE FORWARD FKA PREGNANCY CARE OF CINCINNATI$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ANSWERS TO LIFE$15,000
PURE HOPE COALITION$15,000
MIAMI VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$15,000
ALPINE CHAPEL$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE HOUSE MISSION: $60k → 12%ANSWERS TO LIFE: $15k → 15%ANSWERS TO LIFE: $15k → 15%ANSWERS TO LIFE: $15k → 15%ANSWERS TO LIFE: $15k → 15%ANSWERS TO LIFE: $10k → 15%ANSWERS TO LIFE: $10k → 15%ANSWERS TO LIFE: $10k → 15%ANSWERS TO LIFE: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.9M · 24 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +100% since the first grant, against -42% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$5.9M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
-42%

Still filing today

38%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +147%
  • MV
    MIAMI VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $650k · revenue +250%
  • CG
    CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $624k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE RESCUE MISSION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue -42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
2
Fountain of Hope Ame Church

Our mission. to seek out and save the lost and help the needy and also to spread the word of god as written in the holy bible.

Religion
3
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
4
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
5
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

6
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
7
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
8
Jessica Yoon Ministries

Spread the Christianity

Religion
9
Puzzle Piece Ministries

To deliver the message of Jesus

Religion
10
House of Prayer for All Nations

Church ministry

Religion
11
Salt With a Mission

Teach the ministry of christ

Religion
12
Praveen Evangelisitc Ministries

Ministries church

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes and the most unlike its peers is Jesus in Vietnam Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES — $623,874 · OtherCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATESTHE ALPINE CHAPEL — $485,000 · OtherTHE ALPINE CHAPELPRECEPT INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES — $410,000 · OtherPRECEPT INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIESGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INC — $350,000 · OtherGOSPEL RESCUE MISSION INCTEEN CHALLENGE OF ARIZONA INC — $295,000 · OtherTEEN CHALLENGE OF ARIZONA INCFOCUS ON THE FAMILY — $200,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYKIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherKIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATIONHANDS OF HOPE — $185,000 · OtherHANDS OF HOPE+8 more — $323,500 · Other+8 morePUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $1,285,000 · EducationPUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INCMIAMI VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $650,000 · EducationMIAMI VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMYSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $390,000 · ReligionJESUS IN VIETNAM MINISTRIES — $40,000 · ReligionLIFE FORWARD PREGNANCY CARE OF CINCINNATI INC — $170,000 · HealthAnswers For Life — $100,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE RESCUE MISSION INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentPUREHOPE COALITION — $45,000 · Civil Rights
Other$3,072,374Education$1,935,000Religion$430,000Health$170,000Human Services$160,000Youth Development$125,000Civil Rights$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC — $1,285,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $650,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES — $623,874 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $390,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE FORWARD PREGNANCY CARE OF CINCINNATI INC — $170,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $125,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAnswers For Life — $100,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetHOPE HOUSE RESCUE MISSION INC — $60,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPUREHOPE COALITION — $45,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetJESUS IN VIETNAM MINISTRIES — $40,000 over 8y, 4.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUSCH RIDGE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds MIAMI VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
  • Who funds CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LIFE FORWARD PREGNANCY CARE OF CINCINNATI INC
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds Answers For Life
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds PUREHOPE COALITION
  • Who funds JESUS IN VIETNAM MINISTRIES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona IncAZ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization George and Deborah Mehl Family Foundation Inc C/O W Stuart Dornette funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to George and Deborah Mehl Family Foundation Inc C/O W Stuart Dornette?

    Find your warmest path to George and Deborah Mehl Family Foundation Inc C/O W Stuart Dornette through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph