Skip to content

· Public charity

Genesis la Economic Growth Corporation

The primary purpose of the organization shall be to combat community deterioration by assisting, implmenting, supporting or contributing to the support of programs, projects and activities of public nature designed to stimulate economic development.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$251k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Community Improvement$16MHousing & Shelter$648kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kCrime & Legal$10kArts & Culture$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $1,350,058, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,412,380 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $62,322 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $24k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $251k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$161M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE TOKYO SERVICE CENTER$250,741
COMMUNITY COALITION$175,000
PACOIMA BEAUTIFUL$175,000
AERO BUILD$150,000
RJS OPPORTUNITIES INC$100,000
UNITED CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY$100,000
BOOCLT$100,000
MASBUILD$75,000
LIFE CONNOISSEURS$75,000
CENTER OF HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$75,000
SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE INC$50,000
TRUST SOUTH LA$12,317
OFFICE OF OFFICE CORP$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOOCLT: $100k → 12%BLACK OWNED AND OPERATED COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC: $3.0M → 14%UNITED CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 11 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
18

Total granted

$7.7M
$9.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+96%

Still filing today

73%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $625k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BO
    BLACK OWNED AND OPERATED COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +16%
  • COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +33%
  • IA
    INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY
    2× · 2019–2021 · $611k · revenue +283% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • VC
    VM COMMERCIAL LENDER LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $8.5M
  • CF
    COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $564k · revenue +69%
  • EL
    EAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION
    one grant, 2019 · $204k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles

To foster interest among its community members in social community economic and environmental conditions and growth. and to assist in the development of affordable housing in southern california by providing housing development and…

Community Improvement
2
La Chinatown Community Land Trust

LA Chinatown Community Land Trusts mission is to build community power to keep Chinatown livable for low-income and immigrant communities by acquiring property, preserving affordability, and stewarding land for future generations.Its most…

Housing & Shelter
3
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
4
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
5
Community Development Technologies Center

To build livable and economically viable communities in the low income areas of This is accomplished by Greater Los Angeles strengthening the skils and self-sufficiency of residents, businesses of residents, businesses and community…

Community Improvement
6
Latino Business Chamber of Greater La Foundation Inc

To facilitate economic structures and policy initiatives that empower Latino business development and foster economic growth across Los Angeles.

Human Services
7
Southside Coalition of Community Health Centers

The Southside Coalition of Community Health Centers is a nonprofit organization established to sustain, coordinate, and improve health care access and delivery to impoverished and vulnerable community members of South Los Angeles.

Health
8
Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative

Los angeles neighborhood initiative was formed in 1994 as an agency designed to be a catalytic program that initiates and encourages neighborhood revitalization in transit-dependent urban neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
9
Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust

LANLT's mission is to grow healthier, safer, and stronger communities by creating urban parks and community gardens that remedy the critical lack of green and recreational spaces in greater Los Angeles' underserved neighborhoods.

Environment
10
Community Build Inc

To change the conditions which lead to los angeles civil unrest through job creation, research and real property development programs.

—
11
Abundant Housing La

To encourage, advocate for, and support the creation of an equitable and environmentally sustainable region where all current and future Angelenos can afford to live, including through legislation, regulations, and government programs.

—
12
Coalition for Responsible and Equitable Economic Development Los Angeles

To ensure that the workers in the construction industry in Los Angeles are highly trained and professional. The organization seeks the creation of good jobs, safety for workers, health care and a secure retirement for working families.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fideicomiso Comunitario Tierra Libre; the most unlike its peers is East to West Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VM COMMERCIAL LENDER LLC: $8,500,000 · OtherVM COMMERCIAL LENDER LLCCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEV: $337,007 · Other+18 more: $843,119 · Other+18 moreBLACK OWNED AND OPERATED COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC: $3,100,000 · Human ServicesBLACK OWNED AND OPER…+1 more: $100,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT: $1,466,551 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY COALITI…INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $611,250 · Community ImprovementINCLUSIVE ACTION …1979 LEGACY CORP: $416,100 · Community Improvement1979 LEGACY CORP+4 more: $204,000 · Community Improvement+4 morePACOIMA BEAUTIFUL: $916,745 · EnvironmentRESTORE NEIGHBORHOODS LA INC: $406,516 · Housing & ShelterTENEMOS QUE RECLAMAR Y UNIDOS SALVAR LA TIERRA-SOUTH LA: $239,073 · Housing & ShelterEAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $204,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $563,887 · Youth DevelopmentLEGACY LA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$9,680,126Human Services$3,200,000Community Improvement$2,697,901Environment$916,745Housing & Shelter$874,589Youth Development$563,887Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT: $1,466,551 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetPACOIMA BEAUTIFUL: $916,745 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $611,250 over 2y, 30% of budgetCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $563,887 over 1y, 1.8% of budget1979 LEGACY CORP: $416,100 over 4y, 29% of budgetRESTORE NEIGHBORHOODS LA INC: $406,516 over 3y, 38% of budgetTENEMOS QUE RECLAMAR Y UNIDOS SALVAR LA TIERRA-SOUTH LA: $239,073 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetEAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $204,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetUNITED CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $84,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $75,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetFIDEICOMISO COMUNITARIO TIERRA LIBRE: $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTHRIVE SANTA ANA: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetEAST TO WEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLEGACY LA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACK OWNED AND OPERATED COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT ↗
  • Who funds PACOIMA BEAUTIFUL ↗
  • Who funds INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds 1979 LEGACY CORP ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE NEIGHBORHOODS LA INC ↗
  • Who funds TENEMOS QUE RECLAMAR Y UNIDOS SALVAR LA TIERRA-SOUTH LA ↗
  • Who funds EAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CAMBODIAN COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FIDEICOMISO COMUNITARIO TIERRA LIBRE ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE SANTA ANA ↗
  • Who funds EAST TO WEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY LA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Weingart FoundationCA23× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · California Community Foundation · Roy and Patricia Disney Family Foundation · United Way Inc · The California Endowment · Durfee Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Community Partners · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Genesis la Economic Growth Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Genesis la Economic Growth Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Genesis la Economic Growth Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Genesis la Economic Growth Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Genesis la Economic Growth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph