Skip to content
Generate Health Stl at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Generate Health Stl

The mission of the organization is to build collective power to advocate for racially equitable policies and practices that center, support, and celebrate black families throughout their pregnancy and parenthood journeys.

$129k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.1MHuman Services$108kPublic Safety & Disaster$79kReligion$50kCommunity Improvement$31kFood & Nutrition$16kHousing & Shelter$15kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $67k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CONSULTANTS AND RECB STIPENDS$66,975
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$26,250
FAMILY FORWARD$12,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES$12,000
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY FORWARD: $14k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $12k → 11%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $16k → 21%FAMILY CARE HEALTH CENTERS: $12k → 21%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $30k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $14k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $8k → 21%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $12k → 11%OUR LADY'S INN MATERNITY HOME: $5k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $35k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $32k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $30k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $30k → 11%SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5k → 21%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $13k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $8k → 11%HELPING HAND ME DOWNS: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MO: $14k → 11%ARCHS: $21k → 21%THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $17k → 21%THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $10k → 21%THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $9k → 21%THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $7k → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $5k → 21%URBAN SPROUTS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 20 repeat orgs$438k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
47

Total granted

$2.1M
$438k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+7%

Still filing today

70%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterReligionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NURSES FOR NEWBORNS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $204k · revenue +23%
  • JB
    JAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $203k · revenue +129% · 40% of their budget
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $186k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • SE
    SOLIDARITY ECONOMY STL LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $64k
  • GC
    GLADIATOR CONSULTING
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • HP
    HEARTLAND PMAD CONSULTANTS LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $41k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

—
2
Behavioral Health Network of Greater St

Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.

Health
3
Community Builders Network of Metro St Louis

The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…

Community Improvement
4
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
5
Missouri Family Health Council Inc

We exist to ensure that everyone - no matter their income, geography, identity, or circumstances - can access high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare.

Health
6
St Joseph Housing Initiative

As a faith-based organization, our mission is to create vibrant communities through affordable quality housing where low and moderate income families can thrive, prosper and build wealth.

Housing & Shelter
7
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
8
Generate Health Stl

The mission of the organization is to build collective power to advocate for racially equitable policies and practices that center, support, and celebrate black families throughout their pregnancy and parenthood journeys.

Health
9
Magdala House

To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…

Health
10
Urban Harvest Stl

Urban Harvest STL builds community around inclusive and resilient local food systems.

Food & Nutrition
11
St Patrick Center

St. patrick center transforms lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

—
12
Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri

Inspired by the gospel of the beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission St Louis; the most unlike its peers is Gift of Dreams. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/44
Grantees still filing
33/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS CONSULTANTS AND RECB STIPENDS: $487,010 · OtherVARIOUS CONSULTANTS AND RECB STIPENDSLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI: $117,698 · OtherLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURIBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $88,356 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICESST LOUIS CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $75,113 · OtherST LOUIS CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENTSOLIDARITY ECONOMY STL LLC: $63,857 · OtherUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $51,175 · OtherGLADIATOR CONSULTING: $49,500 · Other+35 more: $359,976 · Other+35 moreJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE: $202,960 · HealthJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGEFamily Care Health Centers: $148,688 · HealthFamily Care Health CentersCASA DE SALUD: $131,830 · HealthCASA DE SALUDSSM HEALTH CARE ST LOUIS: $64,267 · HealthSSM HEALTH CARE ST LOUISPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $36,666 · HealthPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATION…+2 more: $15,000 · HealthNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $204,070 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBO…CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $59,409 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME …THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $42,515 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S SAFE…AREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES: $20,800 · Human ServicesAREA RESOURCES F…ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $16,250 · Human Services+5 more: $25,000 · Human Services+5 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $186,221 · EducationKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $61,240 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ACCESS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentMIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSROADS ANTI-RACISM ORGANIZING & TRAINING: $18,750 · Civil RightsFORWARD THROUGH FERGUSON: $17,750 · Civil RightsNORTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HAVEN OF GRACE: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterRIVERVIEW WEST FLORISSANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,292,685Health$599,411Human Services$368,044Education$186,221Youth Development$71,240Civil Rights$36,500Housing & Shelter$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $204,070 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetJAMAA BIRTH VILLAGE: $202,960 over 2y, 40% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $186,221 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Care Health Centers: $148,688 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCASA DE SALUD: $131,830 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI: $117,698 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSSM HEALTH CARE ST LOUIS: $64,267 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL: $61,240 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $59,409 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $42,515 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAffinia Healthcare: $41,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $39,510 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $36,666 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES: $20,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFORWARD THROUGH FERGUSON: $17,750 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $16,250 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRUSTIC ROOTS SANCTUARY CO: $11,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALIVE AND WELL COMMUNITIES: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGIFT OF DREAMS: $5,000 over 1y, 65% of budgetTHE ACCESS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetURBAN SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOUSING INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HAVEN OF GRACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISSION ST LOUIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARK CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOUR LADYS INN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlmost Home: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHELPING HAND ME DOWNS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS D/B/A UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERVIEW WEST FLORISSANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…Commerce Bancshares F…St Louis Community Fo…United Way of Greater…Washington UniversityWorld Wide Technology…Employees Community F…Trio Foundation of St…Norman J Stupp Founda…Pott FoundationBrown Dana Charitable…Youthbridge Community…
St Louis Community Foundation IncMO54.9× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Washington University · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Pott Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Youthbridge Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Generate Health Stl funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Generate Health Stl. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Generate Health Stl’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home