Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Geisen Scheper Charitable Fdn Inc Co US

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$115kHealth$39kEducation$21kPhilanthropy$17kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$5kEmployment$4kFood & Nutrition$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$588k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIOCESE OF COVINGTON$2,500
NOTRE DAME ACADEMY$2,500
THE CINCINNATI BALLET COMPANY INC$1,000
THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY$1,000
ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION$1,000
CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PARISH KITCHEN$1,000
Individual grant recipient$700
BRIGHTON CENTER$500
WELCOME HOUSE$500
COVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $3k → 11%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%LIFE LEARNING CENTER: $1k → 11%CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
MO
KY
DC
LA
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$52k · 14 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
25

Total granted

$52k
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+23%

Still filing today

57%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts
    3× · 2020–2023 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • CK
    CancerFree KIDS
    2× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +121%
  • LL
    Life Learning Center Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $4k · revenue +665%

Funded once

  • ST
    SAINT THERESE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $105k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $62k
  • CS
    CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
5
The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

As a trusted and connected partner, we inspire generous people to invest in a more equitable and vibrant region now and for generations to come.

Philanthropy
6
Montgomery County Community Foundation

The mission of the Montgomery County Community Foundation (MCCF) is to provide leadership in Montgomery County by directing sustainable financial resources that strengthen our community and improve the quality of life for current and…

Philanthropy
7
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
8
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
9
The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati

The mission of The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati (TCT) is to educate, entertain and engage audiences of all ages through professional theatrical productions and arts education programming. Our vision is to awaken a lifelong love of…

Arts & Culture
10
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

11
Circle Health Services

Circle Health fights for equity by healing, teaching, and inspiring individuals and families to reach their full potential.

12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Museum Association and the most unlike its peers is The Butler Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way FederationsProfessional Ballet Compani…Rotary Club FoundationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesCommunity Health CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsEducation Equity LeadershipIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr16%22%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr16%42%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
14%
3,478/25,620

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAINT THERESE CHURCH — $105,000 · OtherSAINT THERESE CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $62,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY — $15,000 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITYDIOCESE OF COVINGTON — $10,000 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $10,000 · Other+20 more — $31,488 · Other+20 moreTeach for America Inc — $5,000 · EducationRON CLARK ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · EducationTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 · EducationUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati — $9,250 · PhilanthropyWishlist Foundation — $500 · PhilanthropyLife Learning Center Inc — $3,500 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY — $1,000 · Human ServicesCOVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION — $500 · Human ServicesCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts — $4,500 · Arts & CultureThe Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc — $1,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $100 · Arts & CultureCancerFree KIDS — $3,500 · HealthSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc — $1,000 · HealthCancer Family Care Inc — $500 · HealthWelcome House Inc — $500 · HealthSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC — $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$233,888Education$12,000Philanthropy$9,750Human Services$7,000Arts & Culture$6,100Health$5,500Housing & Shelter$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Cincinnati — $9,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRON CLARK ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCincinnati Institute of Fine Arts — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCancerFree KIDS — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLife Learning Center Inc — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBrighton Center Inc — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Elizabeth Medical Center Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - GREATER CINCINNATI/NORTHERN KENTUCKY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUTLER FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWishlist Foundation — $500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCOVINGTON ROTARY FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMASTER PROVISIONS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Family Care Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOUISVILLE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY SYMPHONY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWelcome House Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAKER - HUNT FOUNDATION — $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr FoundationOH23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The R C Durr Foundation Inc 541 Buttermilk Pike Suite 500 · St Elizabeth Medical Center Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Chas and Ruth Seligman Family Foundation Inc · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · The Butler Foundation · Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1 · George and Mary Jo Budig Family Foundati Foundation C/O George J Budig

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Geisen Scheper Charitable Fdn Inc Co US funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph