Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gary and Wanda Walsh Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$151k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$150kHealth$139kReligion$134kEducation$45kEnvironment$43kArts & Culture$34kYouth Development$25kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $120k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Little Bit$30,000
Holy Name Catholic Church$30,000
Richstone Family Center$20,000
Orcas Island Children's House$10,000
Island Stewards$10,000
Step by Step Family Services$10,000
1736 Family Crisis Center$10,000
Four Winds$7,500
Sandpipers$5,000
Children's Discovery Foundation (Funhouse Commons)$5,000
Community Youth Center$3,500
ACH Child And Family Services$3,300
Women In Need Inc$3,300
Catholic Charity of the Arch of NY$3,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Sammy's House: $1k → 10%The Family Place: $1k → 14%Women In Need Inc: $3k → 17%Sammy's House: $1k → 10%The Family Place: $1k → 14%1736 Family Crisis Center: $10k → 14%Women In Need Inc: $1k → 17%Women In Need Inc: $1k → 17%1736 Family Crisis Center: $5k → 14%1736 Family Crisis Center: $5k → 14%1736 Family Crisis Center: $3k → 14%1736 Family Crisis Center: $3k → 14%1736 Family Crisis Center: $3k → 14%Los Angeles House of Ruth: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$566k · 22 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$566k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+13%

Still filing today

45%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentAnimalsEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +98%
  • 1F
    1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $29k · revenue +9%
  • OI
    Orcas Island Childrens House
    3× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Children's House
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • AS
    A Stepping Stone Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -23%
  • KW
    Kanner Wonsch Luxembourg Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Houses Usa
Public Safety & Disaster
2
Childplace Inc
Human Services
3
Community Day Care Center Inc

A Kids Place exists to provide a safe, developmentally appropriate environment for infant through school age children. Our focus is to provide a stimulating early care & educational experience which promotes each childs social/emotional,

Human Services
4
Loving Hands Childrens Home

Provide loving home environment, continuity of care, and empowerment of displaced and fragile children.

Housing & Shelter
5
Park Slope Schoolhouse Child Care Center Inc

Striving to create a caring, diverse, nurturing and stimulating child care environment that provides children the opportunity to grow at their own individual pace.

Human Services
6
Kids Crossing

Kids crossing's vision is to provide a safe and caring home for every child. our mission is to strengthen families so they may provide the best care for those children entrusted to them.

Human Services
7
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
8
Child Development Center Inc

The Child Development Center is a developmental day center designed to build the independence of exceptional children through high-quality early education and therapeutic services. It serves special needs children ages 2 to 5 from New…

Education
9
Eagle Rock Boys Home

Residential care for children

Housing & Shelter
10
The Children's Playhouse Inc

The Childrens Playhouse builds community by engaging children from birth to age 8 in educational play while offering friendly support to parents and caregivers. It serves as an informal town square for the High Country, a unique place…

Youth Development
11
Childrens Family Center

Provides family oriented child care for children by promoting physical, emotional, and social development. Fosters intergenerational linkages between children and senior citizens for their mutual benefit

Human Services
12
The Children's Place Inc

Provide mental health services to promote resiliency, wellness and positive developmental outcomes through prevention, treatment, education and family support for children under the age of 9 who have experienced abuse, neglect and other…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Discovery Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Community Youth Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Little Bit: $118,600 · OtherLittle BitHoly Names Catholic Church: $68,500 · OtherHoly Names Catholic ChurchRichstone Family Center: $68,000 · OtherRichstone Family CenterHoly Name Catholic Church: $52,000 · OtherHoly Name Catholic ChurchISLAND STEWARDS: $43,000 · OtherISLAND STEWARDSSandpipers: $23,000 · OtherSheridan College: $18,000 · Other+12 more: $57,400 · Other+12 more1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $29,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NEED INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $2,200 · Human ServicesSAMMYS HOUSE: $2,200 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $33,000 · Arts & CultureOrcas Island Childrens House: $25,000 · EducationPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM: $1,000 · EducationFOUR WINDS: $17,500 · Recreation & SportsOutdoors for all Foundation: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP KOREY: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER: $7,900 · Youth DevelopmentOLD DOG HAVEN: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE LOVEJOY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · AnimalsIF By Innergy: $1,000 · International
Other$448,500Human Services$39,900Arts & Culture$33,000Education$26,000Recreation & Sports$18,500Youth Development$15,900Animals$2,000International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budget1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $29,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOrcas Island Childrens House: $25,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFOUR WINDS: $17,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP KOREY: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER: $7,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMMYS HOUSE: $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA Stepping Stone Foundation: $1,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOVEJOY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 1736 FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Orcas Island Childrens House ↗
  • Who funds FOUR WINDS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP KOREY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds SAMMYS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds A Stepping Stone Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OLD DOG HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds IF By Innergy ↗
  • Who funds Outdoors for all Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
  • Who funds PAGE AHEAD CHILDRENS LITERACY PRGM ↗
  • Who funds THE LOVEJOY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · School's Out Washington · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gary and Wanda Walsh Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gary and Wanda Walsh Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gary and Wanda Walsh Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gary and Wanda Walsh Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gary and Wanda Walsh Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph