· Private foundation
Gary & Denise Gardner Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $4k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO | $150,000 |
| ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO | $60,000 |
| THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART | $50,000 |
| HYDE PARK ART CENTER | $40,000 |
| CHICAGO CHAPTER CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| LYRIC OPERA OF CHICAGO | $2,000 |
| CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Chicago5× · 2019–2023 · $383k · revenue +25%- TATHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO6× · 2017–2024 · $218k · revenue +45%
HYDE PARK ART CENTER5× · 2017–2024 · $158k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- OONEGOALone grant, 2018 · $110k · revenue +7%
- MPMORGAN PARK HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2019 · $50k
- 1W19TH WARD YOUTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.
The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…
The Design Museum of Chicago strives to inspire, educate and innovate through design. As a resource for the Chicago design community and beyond, the museum facilitates an open dialogue about contemporary and historical design through…
Cultivates new and emerging Chicago artists, and aims to benefit artists by exploring art and learning. Through exhibitions, artist residencies, classes/workshops and community building, we are dedicated to cultivating new voices, ideas,…
Chicago public art group brings artists and communities together to produce high-quality public art, extending and transforming the tradition of collaborative, community-involved public artwork.
To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.
The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…
Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.
The Chicago Cultural Alliances mission is to connect, promote, and support centers of cultural heritage for a more inclusive Chicago. We are an active consortium of 50 cultural heritage museums, centers, and historical societies that…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Arts Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Plano Child Development Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds HYDE PARK ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE HEALTH AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
- Who funds Chicago West Community Music Center ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
- Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO CHAPTER CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS ARTS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds TATE AMERICAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
- Who funds CITY OF REFUGE - CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds International Neighborhood Collaborative ↗
- Who funds THE JOFFREY BALLET ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO PARKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds United States Artists Inc ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO SINFONIETTA INC ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New Foundation of Hope ↗
- Who funds Special Children's Charities ↗
- Who funds Floating Museum NFP ↗
- Who funds SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 3ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
- Who funds Plano Child Development Center ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds MAPLE MORGAN PRK COMM FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Field Foundation of Illinois · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Builders Vision Foundation · The Joyce Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Joseph & Bessie Feinberg Foundation · Alphawood Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gary & Denise Gardner Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.