Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Garm Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
18
Grants FY2026
15
Organizations funded FY2025
7%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$13,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 15
FY2020 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
8
Total assets, FY2026
$1.3M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 7% of the organizations Garm Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 9% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving18$95k17%
FY202515$84k7%
FY202415$74k27%
FY202311$66k18%
FY20229$59k0%
FY20219$55k22%
FY202010$64kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$193kYouth Development$95kEducation$57kHealth$22kPublic Benefit$18kPhilanthropy$7kHousing & Shelter$7kFood & Nutrition$3k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Catholic Charities$39,0007n/a
Connecticut College$35,00060%
President and Trustees of Bates College$34,00060%
Boys & Girls Club of Collier County Flor$30,00070%
Guadalupe Center Inc$21,00070%
Valerie's House Inc$21,00040%
Krempels Brain Injury Center$20,00070%
Chinese Family Camp Inc$12,312211%
St Matthews House Inc$6,50010%
Rosie's Place Inc$5,0001n/a
Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Garm Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Catholic Charities$39,0007n/a
Connecticut College$35,00060%
President and Trustees of Bates College$34,00060%
Boys & Girls Club of Collier County Flor$30,00070%
Guadalupe Center Inc$21,00070%
Valerie's House Inc$21,00040%
Krempels Brain Injury Center$20,00070%
Chinese Family Camp Inc$12,312211%
St Matthews House Inc$6,50010%
Rosie's Place Inc$5,0001n/a
Pine Street Inn Inc$5,0001n/a
Neighborhood Health Clinic Inc$4,00010%

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($263k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Garm Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetConnecticut College: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Trustees of Bates College: $34,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Collier County Flor: $30,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetValerie's House Inc: $21,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKrempels Brain Injury Center: $20,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetChinese Family Camp Inc: $12,312 over 2y, 11% of budgetSt Matthews House Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood Health Clinic Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Garm Foundation with peer funders

About Garm Foundation

How much does Garm Foundation give?
Garm Foundation reported 18 grants totaling $94,500 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 15 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2025.
What does Garm Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2026, its largest causes are Human Services (48%), Youth Development (24%), Education (14%).
Who are Garm Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2026: Catholic Charities ($39k), Connecticut College ($35k), President and Trustees of Bates College ($34k).
Does Garm Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Garm Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Garm Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Garm Foundation based?
Garm Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Garm’s filings →

More from the funding graph