Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gardiner Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$244kEducation$165kRecreation & Sports$163kYouth Development$139kPublic Benefit$60kHuman Services$55kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kArts & Culture$18k
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAWRENCE & MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$30,000
HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC$20,000
THE WILLIAMS SCHOOL$20,000
WATERFORD YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
TOWN OF WATERFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT$10,000
HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC$10,000
NEW LONDON COUNTY 4-H PROGRAM$10,000
WATERFORD AMBULANCE SERVICE$5,000
WATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL$5,000
ABS-AIR SAFETY FDN$5,000
WATERFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
NIANTIC BAY SAILING ACADEMY$5,000
TERRY BRODEUR BREAST CANCER FDN$5,000
WATERFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
NEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FDN INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$812k · 22 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$812k
$25k

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $100k · revenue +21%
  • HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $44k · revenue +15%
  • CA
    CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TO
    TOWN OF WATERFORD YOUTH AND FAMILY
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • TO
    TOWN OF WATERFORD CHILDRENS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Winchester Historical Society
—
2
Wethersfield Historical Society

The purpose of the "Society" is to collect, preserve, and interpret Wethersfield's past for the education and enjoyment of present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
3
Lmw Healthcare Inc

To provide medical care in the westerly, rhode island community and surrounding towns.

Health
4
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
5
Northeast Medical Group Inc

To render medical treatment to patients without regard to ability to pay for such treatment, and to promote a high quality of medical care and other services for the benefit of all persons in the communities it serves.

—
6
Bridgeport Hospital

To operate an acute care hospital in bridgeport, connecticut for the care and treatment of persons suffering from disease or other physical or mental conditions without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age or ability to pay.

Health
7
Western Connecticut Health Network Affiliates Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
8
The Westerly Hospital Foundation Inc

The foundation was organized to support lmw healthcare inc. and to promote the charitable, educational and scientific purposes of the hospital through management of philanthropic activities and support for lmw healthcare inc.

Health
9
Visiting Nurse Association of Southeastern Connecticut Inc

To provide and administer a comprehensive multidisciplinary, therapeutic and public health nursing program primarily to residents of the southeastern connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
10
The Norwalk Hospital Association

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
11
The Danbury Hospital

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
12
Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut Inc

Visiting Nurse Services of Connecticut, Inc., (VNS) a nonprofit health care provider, finds its mission in the provision of quality home health and hospice services to individuals, families and the communities it serves. VNS is committed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hole in the Wall Gang Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is New London County Historical Societ. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WILLIAMS SCHOOL: $115,000 · OtherTHE WILLIAMS SCHOOLTOWN OF WATERFORD: $60,000 · OtherTOWN OF WATERFORDNEW LONDON COUNTY 4-H PROGRAM: $50,000 · OtherNEW LONDON COUNTY 4-H PROGRAMHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $44,000 · OtherHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INCVISITING NURSE ASSOC OF: $35,000 · OtherVISITING NURSE ASSOC OFIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTOWN OF WATERFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT: $30,000 · OtherTOWN OF WATERFORD POLICE DEPARTMENTTOWN OF WATERFORD PARKS: $26,000 · OtherMIRACLE LEAGUE OF SE CT: $25,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING: $20,000 · Other+12 more: $114,000 · Other+12 moreLAWRENCE MEMORIAL CORPORATION: $120,000 · HealthLAWRENCE MEMORIAL CO…LAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthLAWRENCE MEMORIAL HO…Terri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $15,000 · HealthTerri Brodeur Breast…HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE W…NEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNiantic Bay Sailing Academy Inc: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesWATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $35,000 · Education
Other$549,000Health$165,000Recreation & Sports$110,000Human Services$40,000Education$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAWRENCE MEMORIAL CORPORATION: $120,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $44,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WATERFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY: $15,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTerri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWATERFORD AMBULANCE SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNiantic Bay Sailing Academy Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetNEW LONDON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIET: $3,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGirl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAWRENCE MEMORIAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH HOPES THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WATERFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Terri Brodeur Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATERFORD AMBULANCE SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Niantic Bay Sailing Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW LONDON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIET ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chelsea Groton FoundationCT24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chelsea Groton Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Dime Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gardiner Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gardiner Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Child and Family Agency of Southeastern Connecticut Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Waterford Country School Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc: 2% of income from government
  • High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Lawrence Memorial Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gardiner Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph